WebActions: Difference between revisions

good examples, bad examples
(→‎articles and posts: WIRED/Chromium blog)
(good examples, bad examples)
Line 61: Line 61:
* 2012-05-15 Chromium Blog: [http://blog.chromium.org/2012/05/connect-with-web-intents.html Connect with Web Intents]
* 2012-05-15 Chromium Blog: [http://blog.chromium.org/2012/05/connect-with-web-intents.html Connect with Web Intents]
* some abstract use-cases https://gist.github.com/1222633
* some abstract use-cases https://gist.github.com/1222633
== good examples ==
* Twitter Tweet Actions
** "All our embed codes are hyperlinks."
** <code>&lt;a class="twitter-follow-button" href="http://twitter.com/t"&gt;</code>
== bad examples ==
=== Google Plus Buttons ===
* G+ +1 button
** invalid/non-semantic <code>&lt;g:&gt;</code> or <code>&lt;div&gt;</code> markup
** 1.5 MB memory heap usage per button!
=== Facebook Like Buttons ===
* 2012-06-01 Forbes: [http://www.forbes.com/sites/ericsavitz/2012/06/01/facebook-outage-slowed-1000s-of-retail-content-sites/ Facebook Outage Slowed 1000s Of Retail, Content Sites]
** "The culprit: the rapid spread of the Like button."


== related ==
== related ==
canmove, Confirmed users
2,675

edits