Confirmed users
9,511
edits
QA/Execution/Web Testing/Meetings/2012-07-12: Difference between revisions
QA/Execution/Web Testing/Meetings/2012-07-12 (view source)
Revision as of 16:04, 12 July 2012
, 12 July 2012→Discussion Items / Updates
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
* Recent regression in Jenkins caused multi-configuration jobs to disappear - should we consider using LTS? | * Recent regression in Jenkins caused multi-configuration jobs to disappear - should we consider using LTS? | ||
** Stephen switched us to LTS but we're seeing issues, probably due to our jobs being adjusted for running on latest. I believe Stephen is currently switching back to 1.472. Still worth discussing if LTS is suitable. | ** Stephen switched us to LTS but we're seeing issues, probably due to our jobs being adjusted for running on latest. I believe Stephen is currently switching back to 1.472. Still worth discussing if LTS is suitable. | ||
*** Not yet; might do it later today, but still pondering. | |||
* Jenkins migration to new server is ready. Let's schedule it! | * Jenkins migration to new server is ready. Let's schedule it! | ||
** This was (almost) done today. It turned out that we don't have anywhere to put the current Jenkins box on the network. Stephen is raising a bug for this. The new Jenkins box is probably spinning around trying to replace the current one, so may need someone to revert the DHCP changes for now. | ** This was (almost) done today. It turned out that we don't have anywhere to put the current Jenkins box on the network. Stephen is raising a bug for this. The new Jenkins box is probably spinning around trying to replace the current one, so may need someone to revert the DHCP changes for now. | ||