canmove, Confirmed users
432
edits
Discussion Forums/Request For Comment: Difference between revisions
Discussion Forums/Request For Comment (view source)
Revision as of 01:27, 29 October 2012
, 29 October 2012→>
(→>) |
|||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
As we a consider a replacement, if we use a 3rd party service we should consider if and how we are able to extract/mirror content so it can be migrated in the future. | As we a consider a replacement, if we use a 3rd party service we should consider if and how we are able to extract/mirror content so it can be migrated in the future. | ||
=== Stuck in a Web 0.1 World === | |||
I know, I know. Those kids using HTML in your email need to get off your lawn. | |||
But every participatory environment on the web these days allows some form of rich content. Images, link previews, content formatting, etc. As one example, look at how useful [http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12748246/sorting-1-million-8-digit-numbers-in-1mb-of-ram/ StackOverflow answers] can be when answers have visual explanations and nicely formatted code. | |||
The inability to include images makes the current forum options useless for most UI/UX discussions (which is part of why you'll not find much usage from Firefox FE/UI/UX people there). | |||
=== <<insert your own>> === | === <<insert your own>> === | ||