Talk:FUEL/Ideas: Difference between revisions
(Preference) |
Raccettura (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
http://bbcomposer.elitwork.com/source/bbcomposer/chrome/bbcomposer/content/option_service.js | http://bbcomposer.elitwork.com/source/bbcomposer/chrome/bbcomposer/content/option_service.js | ||
Nicolas FROIDURE - 2007/04/27 | Nicolas FROIDURE - 2007/04/27 | ||
== Thunderbird == | |||
It would be nice if the relevant parts of the API worked in Thunderbird 3.0 as well. This would facilitate extensions that can utilize both products for integration as well as foster Thunderbird extension development on it's own. Most of the API seems like it would work very well on both with little/no changes. | |||
Revision as of 12:43, 18 May 2007
MOZILLA may be a bit long, especially if it is used extensively in extensions. Why not an alias like MOZ or MZ.
Another useful feature for this library would be some helper for boilerplate code in components (and other places). Maybe something similar to the jssh ComponentUtils (generateNSGetModule / generateFactory): http://lxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/extensions/jssh/nsJSShStarter.js (I know there's a bug open about it)
--SylvainPasche 00:16, 8 January 2007 (PST)
I'd love to see some functions to help simplify interaction with nsISupportsArrays of nsISupportsPrimitives. Doing this by hand in JS is extremely annoying.
--Dmose
Preference
If you want, you can take a look at an object i did for preferences manipulation : http://bbcomposer.elitwork.com/source/bbcomposer/chrome/bbcomposer/content/option_service.js Nicolas FROIDURE - 2007/04/27
Thunderbird
It would be nice if the relevant parts of the API worked in Thunderbird 3.0 as well. This would facilitate extensions that can utilize both products for integration as well as foster Thunderbird extension development on it's own. Most of the API seems like it would work very well on both with little/no changes.