Confirmed users
839
edits
SCM/HGtoGit: Difference between revisions
→Benefits
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
* Simplified onboarding for new contributors as Git is better known today than Hg {{devs}} | * Simplified onboarding for new contributors as Git is better known today than Hg {{devs}} | ||
* Git supports new workflows not supported by Hg {{devs}} | * Git supports new workflows not supported by Hg {{devs}} | ||
* Hg occasionally corrupts repositories, no such known issues with Git | * Git lets developers have a single repository (and multiple checkouts if so desired) for m-c, aurora, beta, etc, work {{devs}} | ||
* Git performs better than Hg (modulo in some operations on Windows, which we're working on) {{devs}} | |||
* Hg occasionally corrupts repositories (known bug, wontfix), no such known issues with Git {{devs}} {{releng}} | |||
* Mozilla currently makes use of Hg and Git, consolidation is easier for all devs {{devs}} | * Mozilla currently makes use of Hg and Git, consolidation is easier for all devs {{devs}} | ||
* Better review tools (Gerrit) available for devs {{devs}} | * Better review tools (Gerrit) available for devs {{devs}} | ||