User:Dmose:Protocol Handler Security Review: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
= Status =
= Status =
;Feature tracking bug
;Feature tracking bug
Line 45: Line 44:
* Is system or subsystem security compromised in any way if your project's configuration files / prefs are corrupt or missing?
* Is system or subsystem security compromised in any way if your project's configuration files / prefs are corrupt or missing?
** mime-types.rdf corruption / missing
** mime-types.rdf corruption / missing
** application prefs.js missing
** application pref file (firefox.js or equivalent) missing
** user prefs.js missing
** user prefs.js missing
** ISP DNS expiration
** ISP DNS expiration
Line 55: Line 54:
** Potential Risks
** Potential Risks
*** Phishy? (Encourages in-browser auth?)
*** Phishy? (Encourages in-browser auth?)
*** The HTML5 spec has a http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#security3 list of possible security issues] that should be gone through
*** The HTML5 spec has a [http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#security3 list of possible security issues] that should be gone through
*** Uses of web-handled URIs in contexts other than in href attribute of a element
*** Uses of web-handled URIs in contexts other than in href attribute of a element
**** object
**** object
Confirmed users
2,615

edits