Update:Remora/Discussions Revamp: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: ==Objectives== *Move away from Vanilla for maintenance, anti-bloat, and security reasons *Provide a simple, well integrated discussions interface that implements only the features we need ...) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
*Provide one optional forum per addon, with multiple threads and integrated user log on | *Provide one optional forum per addon, with multiple threads and integrated user log on | ||
*Do we want general AMO discussions, with e.g. discussions of how to create an addon, developer support, suggested ideas for addons, discussions of desired AMO features? Is this adequately covered by the new newsgroup and MDC/Mozillazine etc? | *Do we want general AMO discussions, with e.g. discussions of how to create an addon, developer support, suggested ideas for addons, discussions of desired AMO features? Is this adequately covered by the new newsgroup and MDC/Mozillazine etc? | ||
*Import existing discussions data into new forums | |||
==Implementation== | ==Implementation== | ||
Revision as of 15:52, 13 August 2008
Objectives
- Move away from Vanilla for maintenance, anti-bloat, and security reasons
- Provide a simple, well integrated discussions interface that implements only the features we need
Requirements
- Provide one optional forum per addon, with multiple threads and integrated user log on
- Do we want general AMO discussions, with e.g. discussions of how to create an addon, developer support, suggested ideas for addons, discussions of desired AMO features? Is this adequately covered by the new newsgroup and MDC/Mozillazine etc?
- Import existing discussions data into new forums
Implementation
- Custom to avoid same issues as with Vanilla
Timeline
- Aiming for 4.0.1?