B2G/QA/Automation/UI/Strategy: Difference between revisions
< B2G | QA | Automation | UI
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Plan) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= | =Team Mandates= | ||
* Establish visible subject matter expertise in automation | * Establish visible subject matter expertise in automation |
Revision as of 04:56, 11 February 2015
Team Mandates
- Establish visible subject matter expertise in automation
- Own, expand and maintain QA User Acceptance Test (UAT) automation
- Increase confidence in UAT automation
- Provide expert assistance to improve all phases of UI test coverage
- Catch problems quickly and effectively
- Increase community support for FxOS QA
- Increase quality of and confidence in the product
Challenges
- Automation systems and concerns are poorly documented
- Development and QA have different approaches and needs from UI testing
- UI tests have had no developer support, largely because of Python implementation
- Team has been blocked too much by cross-team dependencies
- Test results are hidden in Jenkins
- Test results have too many spurious failures to sheriff
- Test results only looked at a limited number of times per day
- Community paths poorly defined and advertised
Plan
For UATs:
- Streamline current execution for increased responsiveness
- Document how we develop and execute automation
- Develop a GaiaTest-equivalent harness based on Marionette JS
- Increase the coverage using the Marionette JS GaiaTest harness
For CIs:
- Assist the functional teams by increasing coverage
- Move existing Gaia Integration Python tests to Gaia Integration JS for wider ownership
For Community: