Confirmed users
95
edits
(minor addition) |
(some fennec data) |
||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
* Reproduced partially: vladan | * Reproduced partially: vladan | ||
* Tested using: | * Tested using: | ||
** Fennec Aurora 43 API11 2015-09-30 | ** Fennec Aurora 43 API11 2015-09-30 (chosen together with :kats) | ||
** Chrome | ** Chrome | ||
** The device default "Internet" browser | ** The device default "Internet" browser | ||
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
** Take notes of the relative performance diffs between browsers | ** Take notes of the relative performance diffs between browsers | ||
* Observations: | * Observations: | ||
** | ** "Internet" and Chrome are similar, but between them Chrome is slightly better. We'll focus on Fennec vs Chrome. | ||
** Page load is similar between browsers | |||
** Page navigation is faster in Chrome on some sites (e.g. Wikipedia, ebay) but similar on other sites. | |||
** Fennec has text input lag in autocomplete boxes (google, bing) which Chrome doesn't. | |||
** In general, scroll is better in chrome, but on "light" pages Fennec gets pretty close. | |||
** Scroll _while_ the page is loading is more responsive in Fennec (but still not very good) | |||
** Scroll on some pages (e.g. yahoo.com) is considerably worse in Fennec: | |||
*** Inconsistent progression (momentum) without user inputs. | |||
*** Visible low resolution rendering |