Firefox/Content Performance Program/Observations: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(minor) |
(updated fennec bugzilla links, added another fennec issue) |
||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
** "Internet" and Chrome are similar, but between them Chrome is slightly better. We'll focus on Fennec vs Chrome. | ** "Internet" and Chrome are similar, but between them Chrome is slightly better. We'll focus on Fennec vs Chrome. | ||
** Page load is similar between browsers | ** Page load is similar between browsers | ||
** Page navigation is faster in Chrome on some sites (e.g. Wikipedia, ebay) but similar on other sites. | ** Bug {{Bugzilla|1217415}} Page navigation is faster in Chrome on some sites (e.g. Wikipedia, ebay) but similar on other sites. | ||
** Fennec has text input lag in autocomplete boxes (google, bing) which Chrome doesn't. | ** Bug {{Bugzilla|1217372}} Fennec has text input lag in autocomplete boxes (google, bing) which Chrome doesn't. | ||
** In general, scroll is better in chrome, but on "light" pages Fennec gets pretty close. | ** In general, scroll is better in chrome, but on "light" pages Fennec gets pretty close. | ||
** Scroll _while_ the page is loading is more responsive in Fennec (but still not very good) | ** Scroll _while_ the page is loading is more responsive in Fennec (but still not very good) | ||
** Bug {{Bugzilla|1217370}} On fast scroll swipes, sometimes the momentum is less than expected. | |||
** Scroll on some pages (e.g. yahoo.com) is considerably worse in Fennec: | ** Scroll on some pages (e.g. yahoo.com) is considerably worse in Fennec: | ||
*** Inconsistent progression (momentum) without user inputs. | *** Bug {{Bugzilla|1217364}} Inconsistent progression (momentum) without user inputs. | ||
*** Visible low resolution rendering, especially for fast swipes. | *** Bug {{Bugzilla|1217366}} Visible low resolution rendering, especially for fast swipes. | ||
Revision as of 14:20, 22 October 2015
Windows Desktop
Reference system
- HP Pavilion 15" laptop
- Touchscreen
- CPU: i3-5010u
- GPU: (integrated): HD5500
Experiments
Windows 8 vs Windows 10 (Firefox)
- Performed by: aklotz, avih
TBD
GFX and e10s configurations (Firefox and others)
- Performed by: aklotz, avih
- Reproduced partially: vladan
TBD
- performed by: vladan, avih
TBD
Two monitors configurations (between browsers)
- performed by: avih
TBD
Memory usage of e10s, non e10s (Firefox and others)
- Performed by: vladan, avih
TBD
Google maps zoom in/out animation (between browsers)
- Performed by: vladan, avih
TBD
Fennec
Reference Device
- Samsung Galaxy S4
- Android Lollipop 5.0.1 (official update)
- Not rooted
Experiments
- Performed by: avih
- Reproduced partially: vladan
- Tested using:
- Fennec Aurora 43 API11 2015-09-30 (chosen together with :kats)
- Chrome
- The device default "Internet" browser
- Procedure:
- Visit the top 20 alexa sites
- On each site scroll manually and observe the behavior
- Visit some internal links and observe the navigation behavior
- Take notes of the relative performance diffs between browsers
- Observations:
- "Internet" and Chrome are similar, but between them Chrome is slightly better. We'll focus on Fennec vs Chrome.
- Page load is similar between browsers
- Bug 1217415 Page navigation is faster in Chrome on some sites (e.g. Wikipedia, ebay) but similar on other sites.
- Bug 1217372 Fennec has text input lag in autocomplete boxes (google, bing) which Chrome doesn't.
- In general, scroll is better in chrome, but on "light" pages Fennec gets pretty close.
- Scroll _while_ the page is loading is more responsive in Fennec (but still not very good)
- Bug 1217370 On fast scroll swipes, sometimes the momentum is less than expected.
- Scroll on some pages (e.g. yahoo.com) is considerably worse in Fennec: