Firefox/Content Performance Program/Observations: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Two monitors configurations (between browsers) - added data) |
|||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
** When both monitors have the same rate - all browsers behave optimally. | ** When both monitors have the same rate - all browsers behave optimally. | ||
** Firefox is the best, with only a single suboptimal case (and not worse than other browsers in this case): | ** Firefox is the best, with only a single suboptimal case (and not worse than other browsers in this case): | ||
*** When the Windows "main" display has lower rate than the extended-to display (regardless if the main is the built-in/external, or windows 8.1/10), then the animation rate on the extended-to display is the refresh rate of the "main" display (therefore lower than it should be). | *** When the Windows "main" display has lower rate than the extended-to display (regardless if the main is the built-in/external, or windows 8.1/10), then the animation rate on the extended-to display is the refresh rate of the "main" display (therefore lower than it should be). I suspect this to be an inherent Windows issue (need quote). | ||
** Chrome comes second: | ** Chrome comes second: | ||
*** Same issue as Firefox, plus few other cases where it incorrectly uses the rate of the "other" monitor. | *** Same issue as Firefox, plus few other cases where it incorrectly uses the rate of the "other" monitor. |
Revision as of 15:13, 22 October 2015
Windows Desktop
Reference system
- HP Pavilion 15" laptop
- Touchscreen
- CPU: i3-5010u
- GPU: (integrated): HD5500
Experiments
Windows 8 vs Windows 10 (Firefox)
- Performed by: aklotz, avih
TBD
GFX and e10s configurations (Firefox and others)
- Performed by: aklotz, avih
- Reproduced partially: vladan
TBD
- performed by: vladan, avih
TBD
Two monitors configurations (between browsers)
- performed by: avih
- Test how well browsers use the correct refresh rate in a two monitors configuration.
- tested using: http://www.vsynctester.com/index.html
- Procedure - with a single browser window, check all combinations of the following variables:
- Browser: Firefox release / nightly / Chrome / IE / Edge (win10 only)
- OS: Windows 8.1 / Windows 10
- Windows "main" display: laptop's built-in / external monitor
- The browser window is at: laptop's built-in / external monitor
- Laptop's built in display refresh rate: lower/identical/higher than that of the external monitor
- Observations:
- When both monitors have the same rate - all browsers behave optimally.
- Firefox is the best, with only a single suboptimal case (and not worse than other browsers in this case):
- When the Windows "main" display has lower rate than the extended-to display (regardless if the main is the built-in/external, or windows 8.1/10), then the animation rate on the extended-to display is the refresh rate of the "main" display (therefore lower than it should be). I suspect this to be an inherent Windows issue (need quote).
- Chrome comes second:
- Same issue as Firefox, plus few other cases where it incorrectly uses the rate of the "other" monitor.
- IE/Edge are last:
- Same issues as Firefox and Chrome, plus when the main display is the laptop, and it has a lower rate than the external display, on both win8/10 -> it uses weird rAF rate (67hz, 64hz) which doesn’t match any monitor.
Memory usage of e10s, non e10s (Firefox and others)
- Performed by: vladan, avih
TBD
Google maps zoom in/out animation (between browsers)
- Performed by: vladan, avih
TBD
Fennec
Reference Device
- Samsung Galaxy S4
- Android Lollipop 5.0.1 (official update)
- Not rooted
Experiments
- Performed by: avih
- Reproduced partially: vladan
- Tested using:
- Fennec Aurora 43 API11 2015-09-30 (chosen together with :kats)
- Chrome
- The device default "Internet" browser
- Procedure:
- Visit the top 20 alexa sites
- On each site scroll manually and observe the behavior
- Visit some internal links and observe the navigation behavior
- Take notes of the relative performance diffs between browsers
- Observations:
- "Internet" and Chrome are similar, but between them Chrome is slightly better. We'll focus on Fennec vs Chrome.
- Page load is similar between browsers
- Bug 1217415 Page navigation is faster in Chrome on some sites (e.g. Wikipedia, ebay) but similar on other sites.
- Bug 1217372 Fennec has text input lag in autocomplete boxes (google, bing) which Chrome doesn't.
- In general, scroll is better in chrome, but on "light" pages Fennec gets pretty close.
- Scroll _while_ the page is loading is more responsive in Fennec (but still not very good)
- Bug 1217370 On fast scroll swipes, sometimes the momentum is less than expected.
- Scroll on some pages (e.g. yahoo.com) is considerably worse in Fennec: