Confirmed users
52
edits
Discussion Forums/Problem Statement: Difference between revisions
Discussion Forums/Problem Statement (view source)
Revision as of 12:04, 18 November 2015
, 18 November 2015→Why can't we go web-only? One thing is much easier to maintain than three.: link to bugzilla
(→Why can't we go web-only? One thing is much easier to maintain than three.: link to bugzilla) |
|||
| Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
===Why can't we go web-only? One thing is much easier to maintain than three.=== | ===Why can't we go web-only? One thing is much easier to maintain than three.=== | ||
The UI of the web-based discussion forums we can find, particularly with relation to threading and unread message markers, still hasn't caught up with email and news (some might add "in the minds of those who like to read information using a mail/news style interface"). It's very hard to consume a large quantity of information this way. Google Groups may be an exception to this... but that takes us back to one of the earlier questions. | The UI of the web-based discussion forums we can find, particularly with relation to threading and unread message markers, still hasn't caught up with email and news (some might add "in the minds of those who like to read information using a mail/news style interface"). It's very hard to consume a large quantity of information this way. Google Groups may be an exception to this... but that takes us back to one of the earlier questions and posts to Google Groups can be lost due to its UI, see https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1225589#c5. | ||
===Why don't we bring it all in-house?=== | ===Why don't we bring it all in-house?=== | ||