Electrolysis/Release Criteria/Graphics: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 22:45, 24 February 2016

The graphics suites may regress a bit (up to 5%) if there are offsetting user benefits elsewhere.

RASCI:

e10s comparison validated: not yet, awaiting jgilbert
Current e10s diff: better or similar
- Windows 7/8: 2-3% better
- Windows XP: 60% better
- Linux: same
- OS X: 3% worse

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 * Informed: cpeterson, elan, release management
-=== talos-webgl ===
+=== talos webgl ===
-Test owner: ?
+* e10s comparison validated: not yet, awaiting jgilbert
+* Current e10s diff: better or similar
+** Windows 7/8: 2-3% better
+** Windows XP: 60% better
+** Linux: same
+** OS X: 3% worse
-=== "canvas" ===
+=== talos canvasmark ===
-This was listed in the e10s release criteria doc, with unclear meaning. Is there a talos canvas test?
+* e10s comparison validated: not yet, awaiting snorp
+* Current e10s diff: better by 2-3% on all platforms
-=== SVG ===
+=== talos tsvgx ===
-tsvgx and tsvgr_opacity
+* e10s comparison validated: mstange
+* Current e10s diff: 30-50% better on all platforms
+* TODO: seems suspicious, requires further confirmation (bug: TBD)
-Status:
+=== talos tsvg_opacity ===
+* e10s comparison validated: not valid (mattwoodrow)
+* {{bug|1250717}} - fix tsvg_opacity validity on e10s