CA/Required or Recommended Practices: Difference between revisions

CA/Required or Recommended Practices (view source)

Revision as of 23:09, 24 August 2016

371 bytes added , 24 August 2016

m

CP/CPS document review links

Kathleen Wilson

Confirmed users, Administrators

5,526

edits

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 During the [[CA:How_to_apply#Public_discussion|public discussion phase]], your CP/CPS documentation will be reviewed and commented on in the [http://www.mozilla.org/about/forums/#dev-security-policy mozilla.dev.security.policy forum]. Here are some examples of previous reviews of CP/CPS documents:
-* [https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.dev.security.policy/zZ5RHXCkpGM/dvx0DjswBgAJ Review Feedback on Amazon's CP/CPS]
+* [https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.dev.security.policy/zZ5RHXCkpGM/dvx0DjswBgAJ Review Feedback on Amazon Trust Services' CP/CPS]
 ** Amazon was commended for the clarity of their CP and CPS.
 * [https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.dev.security.policy/Mezqdljjerc/eHC0JDQwBgAJ Review Feedback on Japan GPKI's CP/CPS]
+** Japan GPKI's CP/CPS did not contain sufficient detail, so discussion put on hold bending updated CP/CPS.
 * [https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.dev.security.policy/gKCqWRmBQ_8/A1eI_zsoAAAJ Review Feedback on ISRG's CP/CPS]
+** ISRG's CP/CPS had enough detail, and there were minor corrections to be made.
 * [https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.dev.security.policy/z1rc7vUSlb0/wJkwv5x3AgAJ Review Feedback on DocuSign's CP/CPS]
+** DocuSign's CP/CPS had enough detail, and there were minor corrections to be made.
 * [https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.dev.security.policy/dYoQcI0e1qA/ucp1cHfVAAAJ Review Feedback on HARICA's CP/CPS]
+** HARICA's CP/CPS had enough detail, and there were minor corrections to be made.
 === CA Hierarchy ===