Confirmed users
1,492
edits
Mobile/UI/Designs/TouchScreen/workingUI/small-format: Difference between revisions
Mobile/UI/Designs/TouchScreen/workingUI/small-format (view source)
Revision as of 17:50, 30 October 2008
, 30 October 2008no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
This is misleading, though. The available space is definitely smaller in terms of pixel numbers, but the pixels are actually bigger on, for example, a windows mobile device like a [http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_i780-2124.php samsung i780]. What's really important is the number of touch-heights (around 7mm tall) that we can accommodate. Here's a comparison of the n810 and the i780: | This is misleading, though. The available space is definitely smaller in terms of pixel numbers, but the pixels are actually bigger on, for example, a windows mobile device like a [http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_i780-2124.php samsung i780]. What's really important is the number of touch-heights (around 7mm tall) that we can accommodate. Here's a comparison of the n810 and the i780: | ||
http://people.mozilla.com/~madhava/files/mobile/winmo/2008-10-30/relative_scale.jpg | http://people.mozilla.com/~madhava/files/mobile/winmo/2008-10-30/relative_scale.jpg | ||
| Line 23: | Line 24: | ||
Which feels less constrained than the previous approximation. We seem to have enough room for the UI vertically -- it's horizontally that it's still more cramped than would be ideal. | Which feels less constrained than the previous approximation. We seem to have enough room for the UI vertically -- it's horizontally that it's still more cramped than would be ideal. | ||
==Fitting Horizontally== | ==Fitting Horizontally== | ||
| Line 36: | Line 38: | ||
(we can clearly also be using a smaller type size on screens of this size) | (we can clearly also be using a smaller type size on screens of this size) | ||
== Zooming user-behavior with a smaller screen == | |||
To come. | |||