Add-ons/InternalSigning: Difference between revisions

From MozillaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
m (s/andym/ddurst/)
Line 33: Line 33:
If any of those conditions change (for example the project is disbanded) then signing access will be withdrawn.
If any of those conditions change (for example the project is disbanded) then signing access will be withdrawn.


If you'd like to request this for your add-on, then please contact [[Add-ons#Who|Andy McKay or Kev Needham]].
If you'd like to request this for your add-on, then please contact [[Add-ons#Who|David Durst or Kev Needham]].

Revision as of 20:24, 9 March 2018

The document on Add-ons in Firefox 57 outlines a series of extensions called "Signed by Mozilla internally".

These are add-ons that are signed using a internal signing infrastructure to Mozilla. The signing infrastructure is not available to anyone other than Mozilla employees. Remaining documentation on how to sign add-ons and who to ask for permission are covered on Mana (page to be built).

Internal docs

See: https://mana.mozilla.org/wiki/display/FIREFOX/Internal+Extension+Signing and https://mana.mozilla.org/wiki/display/SVCOPS/Sign+a+Mozilla+Internal+Extension

What's this for

The primary use case for system add-ons. These are add-ons that aren't really add-ons, they are part of the Firefox infrastructure for delivering features to user without having to land in Firefox and ride the trains. These have been signed internally using a special key since they were created.

This is also used for Firefox features or experiments that want to distinguish themselves from other add-ons in some way. It's planning on being used by the following programs within Mozilla: Test Pilot, Dev Tools, Release Engineering and Shield Studies.

This can also be used to grant a WebExtension access to APIs that we can't (or just aren't yet ready to) expose to all WebExtensions. To use this capability, a WebExtension API is placed behind the "mozillaAddons" permission. A WebExtension that declares this permission in its manifest will only be granted that permission if it is signed using the process outlined in this document.

Can I get access to this?

Don't be upset, but the default answer is no. To pretty much everyone.

We are setting the bar high for this signing. If an add-on is going to be signed this way then it must conform to a few requirements:

  • Have a clear and important value to Mozilla and it's mission.
  • Supported and maintained by a known team within Mozilla.
  • Maintaining and executing a QA plan.
  • Regressions, bugs and issues are the responsiblity of the add-on author.
  • Conform to Mozilla security, privacy and data collection policies.
  • If the add-on is not a WebExtension, or has non-WebExtension parts it must:
    • Use APIs that will not be implemented in WebExtensions or have a roadmap to implementing the WebExtensions APIs.
    • And understanding that regressions, bugs and issues will occur regularly. These are outside of WebExtensions are not the add-ons team responsibility.

If any of those conditions change (for example the project is disbanded) then signing access will be withdrawn.

If you'd like to request this for your add-on, then please contact David Durst or Kev Needham.