Firefox3.1/Blocklisting Security Review: Difference between revisions
(New page: == Overview == ''Describe the goals and objectives of the feature here.'' ;Background links * feature-tracking bug links * specs or design docs == Security and Privacy == * What security...) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Overview == | == Overview == | ||
The work on the add-ons blocklist for Firefox 3.1 has been a series of incremental to improve both the capabilities of the blocklist and the user notification of blocklist events. | |||
Primarily we have added support for severities to the blocklist. A version of an add-on will be included in the blocklist at a specific severity level. Firefox will behave differently depending on whether this severity is above or below a certain threshold. If the severity is too high then the add-on will be totally blocked in the same way as in previous versions of Firefox. If the severity is lower then the add-on may still be used however the user will be warned that the add-on may cause problems. | |||
The second main goal was to improve notification to the user about when plugins are blocklisted. This has been tackled in two ways. Firstly when a new blocklist is downloaded and new add-ons blocked because of it we display a dialog listing all the effected add-ons (previously we only listed extensions): https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=345404. Secondly when the user visits a webpage that attempts to use a blocked plugin we now include an in-page box where the plugin would be. The same is now true for disabled plugins and the user can click the box to get the add-ons manager open in order to manage their plugins. | |||
;Background links | ;Background links | ||
* | * https://wiki.mozilla.org/User:Mconnor/PluginBlocklisting | ||
* | * {{bug|455906}} Support severities for blocklist entries | ||
* {{bug|449027}} Support specifying application range for plugins in blocklist.xml | |||
* {{bug|391714}} Notify user when plugin is blocklisted | |||
* {{bug|391728}} No placeholder for disabled plugins | |||
* {{bug|427743}} Expose File Version Number of Plugins | |||
== Security and Privacy == | == Security and Privacy == |
Revision as of 20:43, 2 December 2008
Overview
The work on the add-ons blocklist for Firefox 3.1 has been a series of incremental to improve both the capabilities of the blocklist and the user notification of blocklist events.
Primarily we have added support for severities to the blocklist. A version of an add-on will be included in the blocklist at a specific severity level. Firefox will behave differently depending on whether this severity is above or below a certain threshold. If the severity is too high then the add-on will be totally blocked in the same way as in previous versions of Firefox. If the severity is lower then the add-on may still be used however the user will be warned that the add-on may cause problems.
The second main goal was to improve notification to the user about when plugins are blocklisted. This has been tackled in two ways. Firstly when a new blocklist is downloaded and new add-ons blocked because of it we display a dialog listing all the effected add-ons (previously we only listed extensions): https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=345404. Secondly when the user visits a webpage that attempts to use a blocked plugin we now include an in-page box where the plugin would be. The same is now true for disabled plugins and the user can click the box to get the add-ons manager open in order to manage their plugins.
- Background links
- https://wiki.mozilla.org/User:Mconnor/PluginBlocklisting
- bug 455906 Support severities for blocklist entries
- bug 449027 Support specifying application range for plugins in blocklist.xml
- bug 391714 Notify user when plugin is blocklisted
- bug 391728 No placeholder for disabled plugins
- bug 427743 Expose File Version Number of Plugins
Security and Privacy
- What security issues do you address in your project?
- Is system or subsystem security compromised in any way if your project's configuration files / prefs are corrupt or missing?
- Include a thorough description of the security assumptions, capabilities and any potential risks (possible attack points) being introduced by your project.
- How are transitions in/out of Private Browsing mode handled?
Exported APIs
- Please provide a table of exported interfaces (APIs, ABIs, protocols, UI, etc.)
- Does it interoperate with a web service? How will it do so?
- Explain the significant file formats, names, syntax, and semantics.
- Are the externally visible interfaces documented clearly enough for a non-Mozilla developer to use them successfully?
- Does it change any existing interfaces?
Module interactions
- What other modules are used (REQUIRES in the makefile, interfaces)
Data
- What data is read or parsed by this feature
- What is the output of this feature
- What storage formats are used
Reliability
- What failure modes or decision points are presented to the user?
- Can its files be corrupted by failures? Does it clean up any locks/files after crashes?
Configuration
- Can the end user configure settings, via a UI or about:config? Hidden prefs? Environment variables?
- Are there build options for developers? [#ifdefs, ac_add_options, etc.]
- What ranges for the tunable are appropriate? How are they determined?
- What are its on-going maintenance requirements (e.g. Web links, perishable data files)?
Relationships to other projects
Are there related projects in the community?
- If so, what is the proposal's relationship to their work? Do you depend on others' work, or vice-versa?
- Are you updating, copying or changing functional areas maintained by other groups? How are you coordinating and communicating with them? Do they "approve" of what you propose?