TestEngineering/Performance/FAQ: Difference between revisions

Line 209: Line 209:
Yes, we can.  We have other projects and a [https://wiki.mozilla.org/images/c/c0/Larres-thesis.pdf masters thesis] has been written on this subject.  The reality is we will still need future data points to show a trend and depending on the source of data we will need to use different algorithms to analyze it.
Yes, we can.  We have other projects and a [https://wiki.mozilla.org/images/c/c0/Larres-thesis.pdf masters thesis] has been written on this subject.  The reality is we will still need future data points to show a trend and depending on the source of data we will need to use different algorithms to analyze it.


== Duplicate / new alerts ==
== How can duplicate alerts can be identified? ==
One problem with [[TestEngineering/Performance/Sheriffing/Tree_FAQ#What_is_coalescing|coalescing]] is that we sometimes generate an original alert on a range of changes, then when we fill in the data (backfilling/retriggering) we generate new alerts.  This causes confusion while looking at the alerts.
One problem with [[TestEngineering/Performance/Sheriffing/Tree_FAQ#What_is_coalescing|coalescing]] is that we sometimes generate an original alert on a range of changes, then when we fill in the data (backfilling/retriggering) we generate new alerts.  This causes confusion while looking at the alerts.


342

edits