2,088
edits
Platform/2009-08-11: Difference between revisions
m
→Roundtable
m (→Roundtable) |
|||
| Line 101: | Line 101: | ||
*** No downtime is needed. | *** No downtime is needed. | ||
** Will show up on [http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/showbuilds.cgi?tree=Firefox3.6 http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/showbuilds.cgi?tree=Firefox3.6] | ** Will show up on [http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/showbuilds.cgi?tree=Firefox3.6 http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/showbuilds.cgi?tree=Firefox3.6] | ||
* Update on Code Coverage (timr) | |||
** [http://people.mozilla.com/~mnandigama/codecoverage_html/ Latest c/c++ results] | |||
** [http://people.mozilla.com/~mnandigama/jscoverage-report/jscoverage.html latest JS results] | |||
** We had a good discussions with the Content and JS teams last week. Some issues we are looking into is specific files with low coverage, how coverage for in-lined code is handled, and annotating the coverage results pages with info like: a file was recently re-designed and therefore previous bug data may no longer be valid. | |||
** Other next steps: Identify with the Dev teams which files should be targeted for additional testing. Work with other teams like the Firefox team to understand how this info could be used. | |||
** Feel free to contact Murali or myself if you want to dig into the data with us. | |||