JavaScript:SpiderMonkey:C++ Coding Style

Basics

The C Coding Style Guidelines apply unless overridden here. If this becomes awkward we should fork and diverge instead of referencing.

The rest of this page is a strawman proposal. Feel free to add, amend, or even correct if something is obviously wrong. Raise issues in the newsgroup.

C++ is powerful, with many degrees of freedom and some attractive nuisances. We should aspire to use it in a lean, close-to-the-metal fashion, and avoid style-over-substance bikeshedding.

Namespaces

• Instead of JS/js and JS_ prefixing for public function and type names, respectively, use

namespace JS { ... }

• Instead of js_ prefixing for library-private and "friend" functions,

namespace js { ... }

• Compile-time-evaluated functions (i.e., template meta-functions) are kept in the "template library" namespace to avoid collision with their runtime counterparts.

namespace js { namespace tl { ... } }

• Other namespaces? Are these names too short and likely to collide?

Classical OOP

• Most structs can become classes, with associated functions becoming methods. This already started for the upvar2 bug.
  • Style detailing: mrbkap suggests left brace before class body on its own line in column 1 to match function style and facilitate vim navigation. People do this already when inheriting, since the left brace can get lost in the superclass(es).

class JSObject
{
     ...
}

• • An easy starter bug to steal and patch.
• Member variable names, private or public, are not decorated. Examples of improper decoration include:

class Fail
{
  size_t capacity_;  // unsightly
  T *mBegin;         // makes babies cry
  T *m_end;          // much typing
}

Sometimes a canonical argument name may conflict with a member name. In this case, one can disambiguate with "this->", although such explicit qualification should only be added when necessary:

class C
{
  size_t count;
  bool fresh;
  void change(size_t count) {
    this->count = count;
    this->fresh = false;  // verbose and unnecessary
  }
};

• Most macros become inline helpers. With LiveConnect gone on mozilla-central, we can make the helpers methods of relevant structs or classes finally, instead of static inline functions.
• Based on 20+ years of bad experiences, we are going to go slow and resist virtual methods and bases, MI, and the like. Function pointer tables for now, as before -- see JSObjectOps needs a make-over.
• Templates are good, Mozilla has positive experience and the portability is there for the kind of RAII helpers we need.
• No exceptions, so std is hard to use. There is initial work underway to make STL-like containers that mesh well with the rest of the JS engine (see js::Vector, js::HashMap, js::Pool).
  • There are still improvements to be made to the new hash table: double-hash implementation; improve bit-mixing into multiplicative hash if the cycle costs can be supported (measurement is required and we should understand down to the bits what is going on); a js::HashSet or js::HashMap<T,void> specialization such that set-like use of hashtables do not waste any space on values.

References

• Mozilla's coding style guide.
• Google's C++ coding style guide.