Webdev:Meetings:2009-10-20: Difference between revisions

Line 93: Line 93:
** Considering alternatives to Pootle due to its horrible performance.
** Considering alternatives to Pootle due to its horrible performance.
** Playing with [http://transifex.org Transifex] instead. Better performance (as proven by [http://www.transifex.net/projects/ transifex.net], though no way to do pre- and post-processing of weird l10n types (I am looking at you, SUMO) [http://transifex.org/ticket/372 yet]. Also, very [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=523309 picky] about malformed .po files.
** Playing with [http://transifex.org Transifex] instead. Better performance (as proven by [http://www.transifex.net/projects/ transifex.net], though no way to do pre- and post-processing of weird l10n types (I am looking at you, SUMO) [http://transifex.org/ticket/372 yet]. Also, very [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=523309 picky] about malformed .po files.
* Da Vinci's [http://www.leonardo.net/flying.html flying machines]: Never flew, but looked cool.


== wil ==
== wil ==
Confirmed users
1,209

edits