28
edits
EmreSevinc (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
EmreSevinc (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
Teachers should be able to chose a relevant page and turn it into a rich and engaging exercise type, send it to their students or store it some repository. Learners should be able to choose their own text and generate their own exercises, but also retrieve exercises stored by their teachers. They will also be interested in seeing their results, in competing with other students and seeing an analysis of their progress. | Teachers should be able to chose a relevant page and turn it into a rich and engaging exercise type, send it to their students or store it some repository. Learners should be able to choose their own text and generate their own exercises, but also retrieve exercises stored by their teachers. They will also be interested in seeing their results, in competing with other students and seeing an analysis of their progress. | ||
== Scalability == | |||
The scalability of ClozeFox can be described as follows: | |||
* The number of languages depends on available frequency lists. | |||
* The capacity for recognizing word categories, semantic fields and difficulty levels depends on the availability of frequency lists, and the information provided within. | |||
* The selection of relevant and meaningful gaps depends on the intelligence of the parsing routine, meaning the capacity to recognize sentence structure. | |||
* More intelligent didactic information can make interaction scenarios, feedback, diagnosis and remediation more powerful. | |||
* The generation of multiple choice distractors can be made more intelligent. | |||
* Closefox activities can be linked to more Web 2.0 tools, social networks and electronic learning environments such as Moodle, Blackboard or Sakai. | |||
== Current status and further work == | |||
edits