Education/Projects/JetpackForLearning/DesignCamp/Agenda/FutureCommunity: Difference between revisions

From MozillaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 7: Line 7:


'''Group 2''':
'''Group 2''':
- sense of community emerging; 3am hackathon, etc.  shared purpose/vision & expertise.  shame to lose it
- look at browse as lens to social learning
- what should we do with the course?  run it again, become part of a bigger curriculum?  what's the future?
- ambassadors: spread the word, get people involved
- connect this community with broader education world
DISCUSSION 1: do you want to collaborate in a community of practice
* yes
* yes
* only as advisor
DISCUSSION 2 (10min): what do you need to get out of the collab to keep motivation above threshold?
* access to expert advice feedback, access to macarthur people
* keeping the list alive, giving feedback, geting coding help and ideas from the list
DISCUSSION 3 (15min): 3 best ideas for collaboration moving fwd and on contest for next year
* the "champion" of the group is the commandante, pilot, navigator
* bring a learning scientist/educator/designer/potential users to the contest and have them give feedback to contestant teams early-on
* connect CS education departments to the courses; make it a lab for a community. if associated with university, might outcast non-academics and older people
* give people the code snippets to get started: now go crazy!  twitter, quizlets, overlay, screenshots
* each alumni gets a code and spreads it to get street-cred for others signing up with their code
* pair a contest alumni with new contestant and give some sort acknowledgement
* in the contest call, specify the learning toipcs: deconstruct x, y, z.  language, science, math, etc.
* "learning" vs "education" vs "hacking education"
* give challenges about subversive learning topics
* get paired up with a "geek big brother" that could be a former parole officer that cannot leave his laptop





Revision as of 22:26, 12 March 2010

Thoughts on the Future of the Jetpack Community

Group 1:


Group 2: - sense of community emerging; 3am hackathon, etc. shared purpose/vision & expertise. shame to lose it - look at browse as lens to social learning - what should we do with the course? run it again, become part of a bigger curriculum? what's the future? - ambassadors: spread the word, get people involved - connect this community with broader education world

DISCUSSION 1: do you want to collaborate in a community of practice

  • yes
  • yes
  • only as advisor

DISCUSSION 2 (10min): what do you need to get out of the collab to keep motivation above threshold?

  • access to expert advice feedback, access to macarthur people
  • keeping the list alive, giving feedback, geting coding help and ideas from the list

DISCUSSION 3 (15min): 3 best ideas for collaboration moving fwd and on contest for next year

  • the "champion" of the group is the commandante, pilot, navigator
  • bring a learning scientist/educator/designer/potential users to the contest and have them give feedback to contestant teams early-on
  • connect CS education departments to the courses; make it a lab for a community. if associated with university, might outcast non-academics and older people
  • give people the code snippets to get started: now go crazy! twitter, quizlets, overlay, screenshots
  • each alumni gets a code and spreads it to get street-cred for others signing up with their code
  • pair a contest alumni with new contestant and give some sort acknowledgement
  • in the contest call, specify the learning toipcs: deconstruct x, y, z. language, science, math, etc.
  • "learning" vs "education" vs "hacking education"
  • give challenges about subversive learning topics
  • get paired up with a "geek big brother" that could be a former parole officer that cannot leave his laptop


Group 3:


Group 4: