Firefox/Projects/FTS and Awesomebar: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:
TAKING OFF
TAKING OFF


* Gecko has some [http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/intl/lwbrk/idl/nsISemanticUnitScanner.idl facilities] for i18n word boundary analysis, but they're not comprehensive or suitable for Firefox's 300 million users.  Too bad.
* Gecko has some [http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/intl/lwbrk/idl/nsISemanticUnitScanner.idl facilities] for i18n word boundary analysis, but they're not comprehensive or suitable for Firefox's 300 million users. (They aren't even used anywhere in the tree.) Too bad.
* Thunderbird does FTS.  I talked with asuth about it, and unfortunately their i18n tokenizer doesn't seem appropriate for us either.
* Thunderbird does FTS.  I talked with asuth about it, and unfortunately their i18n tokenizer doesn't seem appropriate for us either.
* Investigating pulling some components of [http://site.icu-project.org/ ICU] into our tree.  ICU is a large, established, and widely used i18n library that has facilities for word boundary analysis and tokenization.  SQLite supports an ICU tokenizer out of the box.
* Investigating pulling some components of [http://site.icu-project.org/ ICU] into our tree.  ICU is a large, established, and widely used i18n library that has facilities for word boundary analysis and tokenization.  SQLite supports an ICU tokenizer out of the box.
Confirmed users
764

edits