Confirmed users
68
edits
Talk:Labs/Weave/Identity/Account Manager: Difference between revisions
Talk:Labs/Weave/Identity/Account Manager (view source)
Revision as of 10:46, 28 May 2010
, 28 May 2010→Secure UI?: new section
(→Secure UI?: new section) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* You should choose another Relying Party than Yahoo!, because Yahoo! is also an Identity Provider, so the UI is a bit confusing : is the user logging in '''to''' Yahoo!, or '''with''' Yahoo! ? | * You should choose another Relying Party than Yahoo!, because Yahoo! is also an Identity Provider, so the UI is a bit confusing : is the user logging in '''to''' Yahoo!, or '''with''' Yahoo! ? | ||
* I'd like to see much more clearly the difference between the situation where I am not connected AND not known by the RP (really anonymous), and the situation where I am not connected but known (e.g. as the last known user) by the RP. Question also raised in the section "23-Nov-2009" | * I'd like to see much more clearly the difference between the situation where I am not connected AND not known by the RP (really anonymous), and the situation where I am not connected but known (e.g. as the last known user) by the RP. Question also raised in the section "23-Nov-2009" | ||
== Secure UI? == | |||
Some "secure" dialogs would be nice - by secure I mean designed to inherently resist spoofing and phishing by presenting key actions in a way that can't be impersonated by scripts on a website. | |||
An example would be a dialog on a banking site that requests the user re-authenticate to complete a sensitive action. | |||
[[File:example_of_secure_dialog_for_am.png]] | |||
[[User:Triona|Triona]] 10:46, 28 May 2010 (UTC) | |||