JavaScript/HandlingThreads: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In Firefox 4, JS extensions using nsIThread.dispatch won't work the same way they have in the past. The purpose of this page is to document the design choices we have, so we can get to a decision, late though it may be. | In Firefox 4, JS extensions using nsIThread.dispatch won't work the same way they have in the past. The purpose of this page is to document the design choices we have, so we can get to a decision, late though it may be. | ||
Here are the choices we have. We can pick more than one. | |||
= MT Proxies = | |||
=== Description === | |||
=== Advantages === | |||
=== Disadvantages === | |||
= ChromeWorkers w/ usable Constructor = | |||
=== Description === | |||
=== Advantages === | |||
=== Disadvantages === | |||
= Nothing = | |||
=== Description === | |||
=== Advantages === | |||
=== Disadvantages === | |||
= Environment cloning = | |||
=== Description === | |||
=== Advantages === | |||
=== Disadvantages === | |||
= structured cloning with WrappedNative handling = | |||
=== Description === | |||
=== Advantages === | |||
=== Disadvantages === | |||
Revision as of 22:27, 16 November 2010
In Firefox 4, JS extensions using nsIThread.dispatch won't work the same way they have in the past. The purpose of this page is to document the design choices we have, so we can get to a decision, late though it may be.
Here are the choices we have. We can pick more than one.