Platform/XML Rewrite: Difference between revisions
(More plan) |
m (Typo) |
||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
The parser object also supports fragment parsing, but that functionality doesn't really benefit from being in the class that's oriented towards full page loading, so I think even on the HTML side, the fragment parsing functionality should be separated from nsHtml5Parser. | The parser object also supports fragment parsing, but that functionality doesn't really benefit from being in the class that's oriented towards full page loading, so I think even on the HTML side, the fragment parsing functionality should be separated from nsHtml5Parser. | ||
== | ==Basics for Web content loading on the XML side== | ||
I propose making the XML Web content load path have the same structure as the HTML loads path (with document.write simplified out). That is, it would have these major parts: | I propose making the XML Web content load path have the same structure as the HTML loads path (with document.write simplified out). That is, it would have these major parts: |
Revision as of 13:20, 27 April 2011
Goals
- Get rid of nsParser
- Get rid of nsScanner
- Get rid of nsIContentSink and related nsI stuff
- Get rid of nsIParser
- Get rid of content-initiated flushes
- Move Web content XML parsing off the main thread
- For Web content, reuse code from the HTML side
- Less COMtamination
Non-Goals
- Replacing expat
- Hiding expat from application code
- Moving XUL/XBL1/SAX/RDF/XSLT off the main thread
Background observations
The HTML5 parser has a design that works. When document.write handling complexity is not considered, the HTML5 parser has these major parts:
- A parser object (nsHtml5Parser) that nsDocument sees and that holds the rest together.
- An IO driver (nsHtml5StreamParser) that can receive bytes from a network stream, manages the character encoding conversion and pushes UTF-16 code units to the portable parser core.
- The portable parser core (nsHtml5Tokenizer and nsHtml5TreeBuilder).
- Glue code that produces tree ops from what the portable core does (nsHtml5TreeBuilderCppSupplement)
- An executor for the tree ops (nsHtml5TreeOpExecutor)
The parser object also supports fragment parsing, but that functionality doesn't really benefit from being in the class that's oriented towards full page loading, so I think even on the HTML side, the fragment parsing functionality should be separated from nsHtml5Parser.
Basics for Web content loading on the XML side
I propose making the XML Web content load path have the same structure as the HTML loads path (with document.write simplified out). That is, it would have these major parts:
- A parser object (mozilla::parser::xml::Parser) that nsDocument sees and that holds the rest together.
- An IO driver (mozilla::parser::xml::StreamParser) that can receive bytes from a network stream, manages the character encoding conversion and pushes UTF-16 code units to expat.
- expat (portable parser core)
- An object that implements handler callback for expat and produces tree ops. (mozilla::parser::xml::TreeOpGenerator)
- The same executor for the tree ops an on the HTML side (nsHtml5TreeOpExecutor, eventually to be named mozilla::parser::TreeOpExecutor)
Details about Web content loading
Character encodings
expat has built-in capability to decode US-ASCII, ISO-8859-1, UTF-8 and UTF-16 and has an API for plugging in support for other decoders. So why bother with putting bytes to UTF-16 conversion in mozilla::parser::xml::StreamParser outside expat?
Unfortunately, expat has an unconventional API for encoding pluggability. Instead of having an API where byte buffers go in and UTF-16 or UTF-8 buffers come out, expat has an API for loading conversion tables into expat in the format that expat wants. Our pre-existing decoders don't expose their internals in that format. Therefore, to be able to use our pre-existing converters, we can't let expat manage the conversion.
Encoding sniffing should be handled the same way nsHtml5StreamParser handles it in the XML View Source mode: mozilla::parser::xml::StreamParser itself should handle UTF-8 and UTF-16 BOM sniffing. If there's no BOM, an instance of expat itself should be used for extracting the encoding name from the XML declaration.