Update:Remora Schema: Difference between revisions

From MozillaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:


Yes.  That was an accidental omission. [[User:Morgamic|Morgamic]]
Yes.  That was an accidental omission. [[User:Morgamic|Morgamic]]
----
What about a table for canned review responses (if we still want them) and a table for auditing all developer/review/admin actions? [[User:Fligtar|Fligtar]]

Revision as of 18:03, 14 August 2006

« Back to Remora Main

Schema

Notes

Should the users table have a password field? Fligtar

Yes. That was an accidental omission. Morgamic


What about a table for canned review responses (if we still want them) and a table for auditing all developer/review/admin actions? Fligtar