Update:Remora Idea Dump: Difference between revisions

Update:Remora Idea Dump (view source)

700 bytes removed , 31 August 2006

Removed section about filing a new bug.

126

edits

@@ Line 93: / Line 93: @@
 It would be great if each addon had a link to the licence or licenses it was available under, and to the source if the licence requires that distributors such as a.m.o. make it available. I believe we don't have a licensing policy for a.m.o, so it's all the more important to a) make it clear, and b) comply with whatever the licence is if it has things to say about distribution. [[User:Gerv|Gerv]] 14:09, 23 August 2006 (PDT)
 : It's planned to have developers able to specify an EULA, and also for them to be able to use html in the developer notes about the add-on, so they could link to their source code there - is that enough? [[User:Cameron|Cameron]] 08:02, 24 August 2006 (PDT)
-= Developer feedback =
-After having a few discussions with extension developers, I found that they would really appreciate more information about the reviewing procedure. There is a section at [[Update:Website:DevelopersSection#Approval_Queue]], but the procedure entry is not filled yet.
-Maybe it's a good idea to include a link to a extension developer faq (or the wiki section) in the denial email message.
---[[User:Electronical|Electronical]] 04:44, 31 August 2006 (PDT)
-: File a regular ol' bug, this doesn't require wide-sweeping changes as planned for Remora, just someone documenting stuff on the wiki and a simple patch for the site. [[User:Cameron|Cameron]] 07:07, 31 August 2006 (PDT)
 = Addons.Mozilla.Org - improving extension Searches =