Add-ons/Reviewers/MiscCannedResponses: Difference between revisions

(added anti-xpcom suggestion)
Line 53: Line 53:
== Use ctypes or NPAPI plugins rather than XPCOM ==
== Use ctypes or NPAPI plugins rather than XPCOM ==


p.s. you might want to investigate if using ctypes or rewriting as a NPAPI plugin would work for your addon instead. If so then the binaries wouldn't need recompiling for each Firefox release.
<pre>p.s. you might want to investigate if using ctypes or rewriting as a NPAPI plugin would work for your addon instead. If so then the binaries wouldn't need recompiling for each Firefox release.
ctypes:
ctypes:
http://adblockplus.org/blog/binary-xpcom-components-are-dead-js-ctypes-is-the-way-to-go
http://adblockplus.org/blog/binary-xpcom-components-are-dead-js-ctypes-is-the-way-to-go
NPAPI:
NPAPI:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Plugins
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Plugins</pre>
Confirmed users
448

edits