Testopia:FAQ: Difference between revisions
Ghendricks (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Ghendricks (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
'''A:''' There is a fixed patch available for 1.0-RC1 on Bugzilla 2.22 [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=233552 here] | '''A:''' There is a fixed patch available for 1.0-RC1 on Bugzilla 2.22 [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=233552 here] | ||
'''Q: tr_install says to use testopia/tools/patch.exe but there is no such file''' | |||
'''A:''' You can get it from [http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/patch.htm here] | |||
'''Q: Why don't you support Bugzilla version 2.xx?''' | '''Q: Why don't you support Bugzilla version 2.xx?''' | ||
Revision as of 23:29, 5 October 2006
FAQ
Q: tr_install complains that the patch failed.
A: There is a fixed patch available for 1.0-RC1 on Bugzilla 2.22 here
Q: tr_install says to use testopia/tools/patch.exe but there is no such file
A: You can get it from here
Q: Why don't you support Bugzilla version 2.xx?
A: Testopia is still under very rapid development. It is currently being developed against a modified version of Bugzilla 2.22. This means each and every change already has to be "ported" to the vanilla version of 2.22 before it can be made generally available. Since my time is rather limited, I have chosen to place more emphasis on new features and making them stable against a stable branch first. Once things have cooled down I hope to be able to port them to other versions of Bugzilla. If you have taken the time already to make Testopia work with your installation, I would be happy to include it in future releases.
Q: Testopia would be so much better if it did XYZ
A: I agree. It would even be better with PDQ or ABC too. Chances are there is a bug on it. If not, log one here
Back to Testopia