874
edits
Hackasaurus/FAQ: Difference between revisions
m
no edit summary
(→Who owns published hacks, and is it possible to unpublish them?: separated into two different questions and answered them) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
All content remains the property of the original content producers/copyright holders; Mozilla has no ownership over the content. So, if someone remixes foo.com, the parts that originally came from that site still belong to foo.com (unless they were [http://creativecommons.org/ licensed] to allow re-use/remix), and any new content belongs to the user. | All content remains the property of the original content producers/copyright holders; Mozilla has no ownership over the content. So, if someone remixes foo.com, the parts that originally came from that site still belong to foo.com (unless they were [http://creativecommons.org/ licensed] to allow re-use/remix), and any new content belongs to the user. | ||
== Is it possible to unpublish a hack? == | == Is it possible to unpublish/takedown a hack? == | ||
Yes. If you're either the creator of a published hack or the copyright holder of remixed content that you'd like taken down under the provisions of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Millennium_Copyright_Act Digital Millenium Copyright Act], please send an email to atul@mozilla.com and include a list of URLs for the published hacks that you'd like removed. | Yes. If you're either the creator of a published hack or the copyright holder of remixed content that you'd like taken down under the provisions of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Millennium_Copyright_Act Digital Millenium Copyright Act], please send an email to atul@mozilla.com and include a list of URLs for the published hacks that you'd like removed. | ||