Talk:Penelope: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(Attempt to structure the discussion)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
== Structured Discussion ==
== ### Structured Discussion ### ==


(Please edit in place, and keep this concise, non repeating and bullet pointed.  It would be really good to have some feedback from the team.)
(Please edit in place, and keep this concise, non repeating and bullet pointed.  It would be really good to have some feedback from the team.)
[[User:Aberglas|Aberglas]] 01:36, 25 October 2006 (PDT) aberglas
[[User:Aberglas|Aberglas]] 01:36, 25 October 2006 (PDT) aberglas


=== General Road map, QUALCOM ===
=== General Project Road map, QUALCOM ===


* What will the relationship between Penelope and Thunderbird actually be?   
* What will the relationship between Penelope and Thunderbird actually be?   
Line 17: Line 17:
* The fact that attachements are external files, not in the main mailboxes.  (Thunderbird mailboxes quickly become huge and unmanageable.)
* The fact that attachements are external files, not in the main mailboxes.  (Thunderbird mailboxes quickly become huge and unmanageable.)


=== Top Eudora Features not in Thunderbird -- Filters ===
=== Top Eudora Features not in Thunderbird -- Mail/Search/Filters ===
 
* The fast, integrated search.
 
* Able to (optionally) group inbound and oubound mail, almost in GMail like "conversations".  And displays the correct user in the Who column (unlike Outlook etc.)


=== Top Eudora Features not in Thunderbird -- UI General ===
=== Top Eudora Features not in Thunderbird -- UI General ===
=== Top Eudora Features not in Thunderbird -- Security ===
* Inbuilt, crude and thus (relatively) secure HTML viewer.  Passing all incoming mail to a full browser is asking for trouble.  (Thunderbird does have some facilities in this regard, but it still uses Gekko.)  Security by design rather than by patch.






== Post by Post discussion follows ==
== ### Post by Post discussion follows ### ==


== More details? ==
== More details? ==
2

edits