Mozilla.com:Meeting Notes/09-Dec-2005: Difference between revisions

From MozillaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(restore page)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
There: dria, beltzner, zak greant, steven garrity, polvi, pkim


We met this morning to review updates for mozilla.com and mozilla.org. Here are the notes from our talk.
-pkim
----
*Adding awards to mozilla.com
**Steven will try a couple of different treatments for this next week.
*Redirects
**Steven will review next week his list of links with sysadmins.
**We need a list of pointers from mozilla.org content to new mozilla.com content (i.e., where we'd like .org content that is being taken down to point to on .com)
*About content on .org
**pkim will drive review of existing about content and work up a proposal for addressing migration to .com
*Press center on .org
**pkim will drive spec of new press center on .com
**zak: look at setting up a private server that can push to a public server. Publish releases to a directory on the private server, then have a script push out to public via SFTP.
**Should we leave an archive of old releases on .org?
*Thunderbird 1.5 .com pages
**Steven has this on the radar. pkim, steven and mscott to manage new content for Tbird 1.5 launch.
*Process for web site updates
**pkim and steven to collaborate on a document that outlines steps to pushing live new web content. Hopefully before the 2.0 launch starts in earnest.
*Security content on .com
**pkim to drive spec of security content for .com.
*Support/How to content
**What set of content do we want to move or redirect back to .org support/how-to content from .com?
**beltzner: Involve David Tenser
**dria: if we build "how to content", make it interactive
*Steven's list of things that we didn't get to
**Steven will post a list of web stuff that we didn't have time to do for the 1.5 launch, that we should attend to now.
*mozilla.org
**Who should own the site content moving forward?
**zak: make it clear on the various sites: what the sites are for, and who they're for.
*Localization strategy for .com
**Raised as an issue on website-drivers@mozilla.org alias this morning
**Part of a bigger discussion of how Mozcorp works with int'l affiliates
**Should have more input from today's l10n meeting at Mozcorp.
*Webmaster for .com?
**pkim to review with cbeard and justin
*Tone of content on .com
**beltzner: we need a style guide for .com content - language, etc.
*Foundation
**zak: can we get a catalog of all the sites we own?
**polvi: we have [[over 100 domains]]
**polvi to send out domain list to this group for human review
**zak: you can improve the way issues are handled by:
***posting issues/discussions publicly
***posting bugs for all our site changes
***communication around changes to planet and mozillazine
**zak: key things to get across with mozillafoundation.org:
***who we are
***what is our mandate
***what can people expect from the foundation
***Need to enable people to raise issues/track issues - be open/transparent

Latest revision as of 21:34, 15 November 2006

There: dria, beltzner, zak greant, steven garrity, polvi, pkim

We met this morning to review updates for mozilla.com and mozilla.org. Here are the notes from our talk.

-pkim


  • Adding awards to mozilla.com
    • Steven will try a couple of different treatments for this next week.
  • Redirects
    • Steven will review next week his list of links with sysadmins.
    • We need a list of pointers from mozilla.org content to new mozilla.com content (i.e., where we'd like .org content that is being taken down to point to on .com)
  • About content on .org
    • pkim will drive review of existing about content and work up a proposal for addressing migration to .com
  • Press center on .org
    • pkim will drive spec of new press center on .com
    • zak: look at setting up a private server that can push to a public server. Publish releases to a directory on the private server, then have a script push out to public via SFTP.
    • Should we leave an archive of old releases on .org?
  • Thunderbird 1.5 .com pages
    • Steven has this on the radar. pkim, steven and mscott to manage new content for Tbird 1.5 launch.
  • Process for web site updates
    • pkim and steven to collaborate on a document that outlines steps to pushing live new web content. Hopefully before the 2.0 launch starts in earnest.
  • Security content on .com
    • pkim to drive spec of security content for .com.
  • Support/How to content
    • What set of content do we want to move or redirect back to .org support/how-to content from .com?
    • beltzner: Involve David Tenser
    • dria: if we build "how to content", make it interactive
  • Steven's list of things that we didn't get to
    • Steven will post a list of web stuff that we didn't have time to do for the 1.5 launch, that we should attend to now.
  • mozilla.org
    • Who should own the site content moving forward?
    • zak: make it clear on the various sites: what the sites are for, and who they're for.
  • Localization strategy for .com
    • Raised as an issue on website-drivers@mozilla.org alias this morning
    • Part of a bigger discussion of how Mozcorp works with int'l affiliates
    • Should have more input from today's l10n meeting at Mozcorp.
  • Webmaster for .com?
    • pkim to review with cbeard and justin
  • Tone of content on .com
    • beltzner: we need a style guide for .com content - language, etc.
  • Foundation
    • zak: can we get a catalog of all the sites we own?
    • polvi: we have over 100 domains
    • polvi to send out domain list to this group for human review
    • zak: you can improve the way issues are handled by:
      • posting issues/discussions publicly
      • posting bugs for all our site changes
      • communication around changes to planet and mozillazine
    • zak: key things to get across with mozillafoundation.org:
      • who we are
      • what is our mandate
      • what can people expect from the foundation
      • Need to enable people to raise issues/track issues - be open/transparent