Firebug/WeeklyUpdates/2012-06-05: Difference between revisions
< Firebug | WeeklyUpdates
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Jan Odvarko, Christoph Dorn, Joe Walker == Firebug 1.10 == * Release 1.10a10 out * What should be the minimum required Firefox version for 1.10? * List of [http://code.google.c...") |
Sebastianz (talk | contribs) m (Fixed mistakes) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
* Computed panel is empty, test fails | * Computed panel is empty, test fails | ||
** Related to [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=761236 | ** Related to [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=761236 bug 761236] | ||
* We need to fix: | * We need to fix [http://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/detail?id=5221 issue 5221]: Can't debug code made with console of FB 1.9 but can do it in <1.8 | ||
** Still a problem, we need | ** Still a problem, we need Harutyun | ||
== HTTP Monitor == | == HTTP Monitor == | ||
* Maintaining the same code base in 3 environments is hard. We need to revisit the approach here. | * Maintaining the same code base in 3 environments is hard. We need to revisit the approach here. | ||
* We need better packaging system | * We need better packaging system | ||
* Firebug and HTTPM could be separated into more packages that is easier to share. | * Firebug and HTTPM could be separated into more packages; that is easier to share. | ||
* See list of [http://getfirebug.com/wiki/index.php/HTTP_Monitor#Firebug_Integration difficulties] | * See list of [http://getfirebug.com/wiki/index.php/HTTP_Monitor#Firebug_Integration difficulties] | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
* Development done in [https://github.com/firebug/firebug/tree/cookies cookies] branch. | * Development done in [https://github.com/firebug/firebug/tree/cookies cookies] branch. | ||
== Automated Tests == | == Automated Tests == | ||
* Andrew Halberstadt working on the test-bot | * Andrew Halberstadt working on the test-bot | ||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
* Nobody is working on Firebug Lite. Should we make a public call for resources or publicly give up or something else? | * Nobody is working on Firebug Lite. Should we make a public call for resources or publicly give up or something else? | ||
== Firebug Lite == | == Firebug Lite == | ||
* Make a public announcement about Firebug Lite. | * Make a public announcement about Firebug Lite. FWG doesn't have enough resources to work on it and we should try to attract developers with suggestions where the project could go in the future. Honza to put together a blog post... | ||
Latest revision as of 18:53, 5 June 2012
Jan Odvarko, Christoph Dorn, Joe Walker
Firebug 1.10
- Release 1.10a10 out
- What should be the minimum required Firefox version for 1.10?
- List of 1.10 blockers
- Computed panel is empty, test fails
- Related to bug 761236
- We need to fix issue 5221: Can't debug code made with console of FB 1.9 but can do it in <1.8
- Still a problem, we need Harutyun
HTTP Monitor
- Maintaining the same code base in 3 environments is hard. We need to revisit the approach here.
- We need better packaging system
- Firebug and HTTPM could be separated into more packages; that is easier to share.
- See list of difficulties
Cookies
- Firecookie integration [started]
- Development done in cookies branch.
Automated Tests
- Andrew Halberstadt working on the test-bot
Miscellaneous
- If test fails, reopen the original issue or create a new one?
- Nobody is working on Firebug Lite. Should we make a public call for resources or publicly give up or something else?
Firebug Lite
- Make a public announcement about Firebug Lite. FWG doesn't have enough resources to work on it and we should try to attract developers with suggestions where the project could go in the future. Honza to put together a blog post...