Talk:NSS Shared DB: Difference between revisions

From MozillaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(NSS Shaed DB Proposal Review feedback)
 
(Fix formatting)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Review input required: is there a preference between a single DB file or separate key and cert DB files? ==
== Headline text ==
Review input required: is there a preference between a single DB file or separate key and cert DB files?


- (Your response could go here)
- (Your response could go here)


 
== Accessing the shared Database: Reviewer input requires: which default would you prefer? ==
== Headline text ==
Accessing the shared Database: Reviewer input requires: which default would you prefer?


- (Your response could go here)
- (Your response could go here)


== Headline text ==
== Review Input Requested: Question, should we 'mark' old cert8/key3 databases as having been used to upgrade the shared database? ==
Review Input Requested: Question, should we 'mark' old cert8/key3 databases as having been used to upgrade the shared database?
 
 
- (Your response could go here)
- (Your response could go here)


== Headline text ==
== sdb_GetPWEntry and sdb_PutPWEntry: Review input needed: Would it be better to define a 'metadata' operation where we call the database to fetch data that is not reflected through the PKCS #11 interface? ==
sdb_GetPWEntry and sdb_PutPWEntry: Review input needed: Would it be better to define a 'metadata' operation where we call the database to fetch data that is not reflected through the PKCS #11 interface?


- (Your response could go here)
- (Your response could go here)

Revision as of 20:49, 1 March 2007

Review input required: is there a preference between a single DB file or separate key and cert DB files?

- (Your response could go here)

Accessing the shared Database: Reviewer input requires: which default would you prefer?

- (Your response could go here)

Review Input Requested: Question, should we 'mark' old cert8/key3 databases as having been used to upgrade the shared database?

- (Your response could go here)

sdb_GetPWEntry and sdb_PutPWEntry: Review input needed: Would it be better to define a 'metadata' operation where we call the database to fetch data that is not reflected through the PKCS #11 interface?

- (Your response could go here)