Confirmed users
839
edits
SCM/HGtoGit: Difference between revisions
→Benefits
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
* Simplified onboarding for new contributors as Git is better known today than Hg {{devs}} | * Simplified onboarding for new contributors as Git is better known today than Hg {{devs}} | ||
* Git supports new workflows not supported by Hg {{devs}} | * Git supports new workflows not supported by Hg {{devs}} | ||
* Hg occasionally corrupts repositories, no such known issues with Git. | |||
* Mozilla currently makes use of Hg and Git, consolidation is easier for all devs {{devs}} | * Mozilla currently makes use of Hg and Git, consolidation is easier for all devs {{devs}} | ||
* Better review tools (Gerrit) available for devs {{devs}} | * Better review tools (Gerrit) available for devs {{devs}} | ||
* Simplified debugging (no longer have to debug Hg) {{releng}} {{IT}} | * Simplified debugging (no longer have to debug Hg) {{releng}} {{IT}} | ||
* Simplified management as only one SCM system {{releng}} {{IT}} | * Simplified management as only one SCM system {{releng}} {{IT}} | ||
===Issues=== | ===Issues=== | ||
* Overhead in having a large number of people learn new tools {{devs}} | * Overhead in having a large number of people learn new tools {{devs}} | ||