DevTools/Planning/Performance/Details: Difference between revisions

Line 55: Line 55:
'''3) One single recording tool as opposed to distinct recording tools'''<br>
'''3) One single recording tool as opposed to distinct recording tools'''<br>
Does a developer really need to figure out whether to do a "timeline" or a "CPU profile" or a "whatever profile?". Isn't it enough to have one recording UI that provides a container for any "type" of recording? In reality, there is only one recording but with different depths of instrumentation. This does pose a challenge: how to have a combined temporal and memory based view. My gut tells me this is doable, we will just need to find an easy, user friendly way of doing it.
Does a developer really need to figure out whether to do a "timeline" or a "CPU profile" or a "whatever profile?". Isn't it enough to have one recording UI that provides a container for any "type" of recording? In reality, there is only one recording but with different depths of instrumentation. This does pose a challenge: how to have a combined temporal and memory based view. My gut tells me this is doable, we will just need to find an easy, user friendly way of doing it.
<ul>
<li>Timeline layers is one way to give us the ability to correlate different timelines on top of each other.
<li>Each layer can be turned on or off and it would turn on or off the respective instrumentation.
</li>


'''4) Changing sampling/instrumentation depth'''<br>
'''4) Changing sampling/instrumentation depth'''<br>
Confirmed users
83

edits