SecurityEngineering/mozpkix-testing: Difference between revisions

SecurityEngineering/mozpkix-testing (view source)

67 bytes removed , 7 April 2014

m

Confirmed users, Administrators

5,526

edits

@@ Line 52: / Line 52: @@
 # EV treatment is not given when it should be.
 # An SSL connection gives a different error than expected.
-# SSL connections succeed when they should fail, and they did not fail in previous releases. Note that this could be due to not enforcing certain standards, and may be a policy decision. For example, see the [[SecurityEngineering/mozpkix-testing#Things_for_CAs_to_Fix | Things for CAs to Fix]] section below.
+# SSL connections succeed when they should fail, and they did not fail in previous releases. For example, see the [[SecurityEngineering/mozpkix-testing#Things_for_CAs_to_Fix | Things for CAs to Fix]] section below.
-# EV treatment is given when it should not be given and was being given in previous releases. Note that this could be due to not enforcing certain standards, and may be a policy decision.
+# EV treatment is given when it should not be given and was being given in previous releases. For example, see the [[SecurityEngineering/mozpkix-testing#Future_Considerations| Future Considerations]] section below.
 # Code Signing certificates do not work as expected.