Marketplace/Performance optimization: Difference between revisions

From MozillaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
The short version is that we need to optimize things that should be optimized regardless of other constraints (device constraints, network constraints, etc). Only then can we differentiate between strategic investment and Doing Things The Right Way.
The short version is that we need to optimize things that should be optimized regardless of other constraints (device constraints, network constraints, etc). Only then can we differentiate between strategic investment and Doing Things The Right Way.


At a high level, these are the strategies being considered:
At a high level, these are the strategies being considered for marketplace.firefox.com:


# [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=900241 Feature/Memory/Device detection (reliable) (900241)]
# [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=900241 Feature/Memory/Device detection (reliable) (900241)]
# Speed and Performance bugs, general at this point (see below)
# Speed and Performance bugs, general at this point (see below)
## Establish target benchmarks & KPIs for performance
## Establish target benchmarks & KPIs for performance
### low-bandwidth, cold
# Front and Back-end Performance adjustments (pending benchmark results -- currently the mark is "as fast as possible")
### high-bandwidth, cold
### low-bandwidth, warm
### high-bandwidth, warm
# Front and Back-end Performance adjustments (pending benchmark results)


Possibly Tarako-specific:
Tarako-specific:
# Front and Back-end Performance adjustments
# new "low resource" responsive state
## new "low resource" responsive state
# Filtering apps for "low resource" device
## Filtering apps for device (UI)
## payment flow slimming/changes?
# UI updates to accommodate RTL & other local language requirements (pending target markets)
# UI updates to accommodate RTL & other local language requirements (pending target markets)


== Open issues ==
== Open issues ==

Revision as of 20:19, 8 April 2014

This is a page to aggregate information about Marketplace performance efforts; it will be maintained as they morph into and overlap with Tarako-specific issues.

Want to contribute?

Log new bugs in Bugzilla, with the "perf" keyword

Ask about things in #marketplace.

Mitigation strategies

The short version is that we need to optimize things that should be optimized regardless of other constraints (device constraints, network constraints, etc). Only then can we differentiate between strategic investment and Doing Things The Right Way.

At a high level, these are the strategies being considered for marketplace.firefox.com:

  1. Feature/Memory/Device detection (reliable) (900241)
  2. Speed and Performance bugs, general at this point (see below)
    1. Establish target benchmarks & KPIs for performance
  3. Front and Back-end Performance adjustments (pending benchmark results -- currently the mark is "as fast as possible")

Tarako-specific:

  1. new "low resource" responsive state
  2. Filtering apps for "low resource" device
  3. UI updates to accommodate RTL & other local language requirements (pending target markets)

Open issues

These are immediate questions:

These are future issues:


Performance bugs, first batch

These bugs have been identified as delivering good performance increases; they are grouped here for ease of consideration. With two exceptions, they are fairly simplistic in effort. All bugs are open unless

Note that not all of these are Marketplace bugs, and thus not all are in the priority groupings at the bottom of the page.

overall speed

improve API response time

improve caching techniques

optimize asset delivery

optimize synchronous delivery

  • 847679 -- this one is big, mostly because it depends on...

optimize first run

  • 897156 -- ... becoming a real packaged app.


Performance bugs (general)

This is a listing of Marketplace bugs only, by priority. If a priority has not been applied, you will have to find it directly. Here's a good place to start

Open P1-P3

No results.

0 Total; 0 Open (0%); 0 Resolved (0%); 0 Verified (0%);


Open P4-P5

No results.

0 Total; 0 Open (0%); 0 Resolved (0%); 0 Verified (0%);


Resolved: Fixed

No results.

0 Total; 0 Open (0%); 0 Resolved (0%); 0 Verified (0%);


Resolved: Deferred

No results.

0 Total; 0 Open (0%); 0 Resolved (0%); 0 Verified (0%);


Performance data dashboard

Not sure how these apply to bugs yet, because not sure how these poll yet. We're discussing other measurement tools, but here's what there is now: