AMO:Editors/Featured and Recommended

Featured Add-Ons

See Recommended Add-ons

Recommended Lists

See Recommended Add-ons

Trusted Add-on

  • What is a trusted add-on?
    • A trusted add-on will have its updates automatically pushed public without being reviewed by an AMO editor.
    • AMO has a small, select group of add-ons on the trusted list.
  • What is the criteria for becoming a trusted add-on?
    • Does your add-on have a need to be frequently updated?
    • Is the audience of your add-on so large that a pending bug fix could inconvenience many, many, MANY users (as in millions)?
  • How do you request your add-on to become trusted?
    • Send an email to amo-editors@mozilla.org explaining why your add-on needs trusted status.
    • Remember the trusted list is very small. We set the bar very high for this, so don't be surprised if your submission is rejected.

Building Recommendation Lists

If I were to design the idea recommendation list, I would consider whether:

  • The add-ons are generally compatible with each other
  • Not all of them are site-specific
  • Doesn't create a weird first-run experience when more than 2/3 are chosen
  • Represents a sample of the variety of add-ons that are available
  • Represents a cross-section of things that people do on the Internet, e.g. social networking, chat, VOIP, video, commerce, information retrieval, music, info/data organization, etc...

What are some of the ideal criteria for deciding if something should be recommended:

  • Has it been marked as a "favorite" by users?
  • Popularity based on AMO or other locations downloads, already in the hands of lots of users, mileage, tried and tested (at least 20,000 downloads?)
  • "perceived as useful", "well maintained" and "well tested".
  • Helps demonstrate an interesting browsing experience
  • Quality, works as expected, proven
  • Effect on performance (startup time, rendering time, UI zippiness)
  • Effect on memory usage (static and over time, no leaks)
  • Free of security holes
  • Has good feedback from reviewers and end users
  • Doesn't degenerate or severely affect the core Firefox user experience
  • Appropriate for New-to-Firefox Users (new demographic)
  • Demonstrates interesting capabilities
  • Brand compatible
  • Not severely incompatible with privacy policy/No spyware
  • Useful for a general populace
  • Compatibility with current Firefox release (and beta versions)
  • Documentation/associated content (e.g. support on relevant site, mktg, help info, etc…)
  • Licensing - is it trialware?, MPL, etc…
  • Hurdles to get going: does it require a new login? Or extra client software?
  • Compatibility with other extensions
  • Support for addon by developer, forums, docs, etc…