QA/Photon Structure

Approvals Required / Received

The following individuals are required to/have approved this Test Plan:

Name	Title	Department	Approval Date	Method
	QA Manager	Product Integrity	Date	Email
	Software Engineer	Engineering	Date	Email
	EPM	Product Management	Date	Email

Revision History

Date	Version	Author	Description
06/28/2017	1.0	Grover Wimberly IV	Created first draft
08/10/2017	1.1	Grover Wimberly IV	Added details to test plan

Overview

Purpose

The purpose of this test plan is to

• Determine the scope of testing Photon Structure related bugs and features
• Delegate test responsibilities
• Have a test strategy for the levels and types of test for this release
• List entry and exit criteria
• Any risks, issues, assumptions and test dependencies
• List test schedule and major milestones
• List test deliverable(s)

Scope

The scope of this document is to test and verify new features/bugs in Photon Structure are working as intended. Testing is performed on the newest version of Nightly and tested on all three mainstream operating systems of Firefox Nightly. (Windows, Mac OSX, and Linux - Ubuntu Distribution).

Ownership

What resources are needed, and when (developers, QA, PMs working on the feature)

Testing summary

Scope of Testing

In Scope

Photon Structure - Including menus, buttons, toolbar, overflow panel, customization windows.

Out of Scope

Detail what is out of scope from a testing perspective for the project team. Note: if usability testing is not in the scope of testing feature.

Requirements for testing

Environments

Windows OS, Mac OSX, and Linux

Channel dependent settings (configs) and environment setups

Nightly

photon.structure.enabled = true (Default)

Beta

photon.structure.enabled = true

Post Beta / Release

photon.structure.enabled = true

Test Strategy

Risk Assessment and Coverage

ID	Description / Threat Description	Covered by Test Objective	Magnitude	Probability	Priority	Impact Score
RAC-1	Risk description 1	TO-1	2-Moderate	1-Unlikely	3-High	6
RAC-2	Risk description 2	TO-1	3-High	3-Almost Certain	3-High	27
RAC-3	Risk description 3	TO-2	2-Moderate	2-Possible	3-High	12

Values:

• Magnitude: 1- Low , 2-Moderate, 3-High

• Probability: 1-Unlikely, 2-Possible, 3-Almost Certain

• Priority: 1 - Low, 2-Medium, 3-High

Impact Score Breakdown:

• An impact value of 1, 2, 3, 4 would describe an area which although should be covered there aren't expected any discoveries of critical issues.
• An impact value of 6, 8, 9, 12 would describe an area in which we expect to find issues but those issues are not expected to be critical.
• An impact value of 18 or 27 would describe an area on which it is likely to find issues and those issues to be critical or blockers.

Test Objectives

This section details the progression test objectives that will be covered. Please note that this is at a high level. For large projects, a suite of test cases would be created which would reference directly back to this master. This could be documented in bullet form or in a table similar to the one below.

Ref	Function	Test Objective	Evaluation Criteria	Test Type	RAC	Owners
1	Name of the feature or sub-function being tested	The objective the test is trying to demonstrate	The criteria that will be evaluated to demonstrate the test is successful	Manual/ Automation/ Regression/ Performance/ Usability/ Security/ Telemetry	RAC-1, RAC-2, RAC-3	Eng Team
2	Repeat for each feature/sub-function
3

Builds

Up-to-date Nightly build

Test Execution Schedule

The following table identifies the anticipated testing period available for test execution.

Project phase	Start Date	End Date
Start project
Study documentation/specs received from developers
QA - Test plan creation	June 2017	TBA
QA - Test cases/Env preparation	Not applicable	Not applicable
QA - Nightly Testing	May 2017	Not applicable
QA - Beta Testing
Release Date

Testing Tools

Detail the tools to be used for testing, for example see the following table:

Process	Tool
Test plan creation	Mozilla wiki
Test case creation	TestRail/ Google docs
Test case execution	TestRail
Bugs management	Bugzilla

Status

Overview

Track the dates and build number where feature was released to Nightly
Track the dates and build number where feature was merged to Release/Beta

References

• List and links for specs

 List and links for available specs - documents, user stories, specifications

• Meta bug

Testcases

Test Areas

Test Areas	Covered	Details
Private Window	Varies
Multi-Process Enabled	Yes
Multi-process Disabled	Depending on if tests fail
Theme (high contrast)	Yes
UI
Mouse-only operation	Yes
Keyboard-only operation	Yes
Display (HiDPI)	Varies
Interaction (scroll, zoom)	Varies
Usable with a screen reader	Varies
Usability and/or discoverability testing	Yes
RTL build testing	Yes
Help/Support
Help/support interface required		Make sure link to support/help page exist and is easy reachable.
Support documents planned(written)		Make sure support documents are written and are correct.
Install/Upgrade
Feature upgrades/downgrades data as expected	Not applicable
Does sync work across upgrades	Not applicable
Requires install testing	Not applicable
Affects first-run or onboarding	Not applicable
Does this affect partner builds? Partner build testing		yes/no options, add comment with details about who will lead testing
Enterprise		Raise up the topic to developers to see if they are expecting to work different on ESR builds
Enterprise administration
Network proxies/autoconfig
ESR behavior changes
Locked preferences
Data Monitoring
Temporary or permanent telemetry monitoring		List of error conditions to monitor
Telemetry correctness testing
Server integration testing
Offline and server failure testing
Load testing
Add-ons		If add-ons are available for testing feature, or is current feature will affect some add-ons, then API testing should be done for the add-on.
Addon API required?
Comprehensive API testing
Permissions
Testing with existing/popular addons
Security		Security is in charge of Matt Wobensmith. We should contact his team to see if security testing is necessary for current feature.
3rd-party security review
Privilege escalation testing
Fuzzing
Web Compatibility		depends on the feature
Testing against target sites
Survey of many sites for compatibility
Interoperability		depends on the feature
Common protocol/data format with other software: specification available. Interop testing with other common clients or servers.
Coordinated testing/interop across the Firefoxes: Desktop, Android, iOS
Interaction of this feature with other browser features

Test suite

Full Test suite - Link to test rail - testcases should be added under Firefox Desktop project link
Smoke Test suite - Link with the tests - if available/needed.
Regression Test suite - Link with the tests - if available/needed.

Bug Work

Meta bug: 12345 - bug summary

Logged bugs ( blocking 12345 )

Full Query

ID	Priority	Component	Assigned to	Summary	Status	Target milestone
15069	P3	Networking	jefft	File type url not correctly parsed and created	VERIFIED	M13

1 Total; 0 Open (0%); 0 Resolved (0%); 1 Verified (100%);

Bug fix verification

Full Query

ID	Priority	Component	Assigned to	Summary	Status	Resolution	Target milestone
15069	P3	Networking	jefft	File type url not correctly parsed and created	VERIFIED	FIXED	M13

1 Total; 0 Open (0%); 0 Resolved (0%); 1 Verified (100%);

Sign off

Criteria

Checklist

• All test cases should be executed
• Has sufficient automated test coverage (as measured by code coverage tools) - coordinate with RelMan
• All blockers, criticals must be fixed and verified or have an agreed-upon timeline for being fixed (as determined by engineering/RelMan/QA)

Results

Nightly testing

List of OSes that will be covered by testing

• Link for the tests run
  • Full Test suite, link to TestRail - Tests Runs and Results link
  • Daily Smoke, if needed/available
  • Regression Test suite, if needed/available

Merge to Beta Sign-off
List of OSes that will be covered by testing

• Link for the tests run
  • Full Test suite

Checklist

Exit Criteria	Status	Notes/Details
Testing Prerequisites (specs, use cases)
Testing Infrastructure setup
Test Plan Creation
Test Cases Creation
Automation Coverage
Performance Testing
All Defects Logged
Critical/Blockers Fixed and Verified
Metrics/Telemetry
Basic/Core functionality Nightly testing
QA mid-Nightly Signoff		Email to be sent
QA Nightly - Full Testing
QA pre-Beta Signoff		Email to be sent
QA Beta - Full Testing
QA pre-Release Signoff		Email to be sent