QA/Mozmill Test Automation/Test Modules Refactor
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Overview
Lead: | Anthony Hughes |
Co-workers: | TBD |
Dates: | TBD |
Status: | In process of determining style guidelines |
Repository Location: | TBD |
Tracking Bug(s) | bug 604700 |
Documentation: |
Project Details
Summary
The purpose of this project is to ensure all tests are implemented using an agreed style guideline. The workflow of this project will mostly be parallel with the Shared Modules Refactor project. This project will be rolled out in multiple phases.
Style Guidelines
The Mozmill Style Guide v1.0 has been created. The following refactoring work is an effort to implement those guidelines throughout the mozmill-tests repository. This refactoring will be implemented in multiple phases, outlined below.
Refactoring
Phase I
Goal: Implement lowest hanging fruit
Phase II
Goal: Bring tests in-line with Shared Module Refactor
Outstanding Items
Discussion here
- Arrays
- Block style
- What style?
- Single Index
- Multiple Index
- Multiple Index, Multiple Object
- Sleep()
- When is sleep() ok? Is it ever ok?
- Local Test Pages
const LOCAL_TEST_PAGES = [ { url: 'some url', id: 'some id' }, { url: 'some url', id: 'some id' } ];
- Should always be declared as a constant Array
- Use array block formatting
- Name "LOCAL_TEST_PAGES"
- Test Files API Module
- We should have a module specific to loading of test files
- Parameter in setupModule() & teardownModule()
- Is module needed, wanted?
- Error Messages
"Expected <element> to be <state>" "Expected password-save notification bar to be visible"
- Messages should be positive in nature
- <element> should be what the element represents
- <state> should be what state we expect that element to be in
- Parameter Naming
- param or aParam?
- Example: label or aLabel
- the latter is common in Mozilla coding styles
- Scope of Constants
- Global or within the tightest scope?
- Review Guidelines
What are our "golden-rule" guidelines for different review states?
- r?
- r+
- r-
- feedback?
- feedback+
- feedback-