Calendar:QA TODO

From MozillaWiki
Revision as of 20:50, 25 January 2007 by Ctalbert (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

<< Back to Calendar QA Home Page

Valid from January 18 to February 1

This is the calendar QA To Do list. Please pick an item and give us a hand! Let us know what you did on which ever task by adding a comment in the "Accomplishments" column. To do that, simply click "Edit" above, and replace the "<Add your accomplishment>" text with a short summary of what you did. If you have any questions please log into irc://irc.mozilla.org and ask in the #calendar-qa channel.

Thanks for the Help

ToDo List
Tasks Accomplishments

Verify these bugs:

<Add your accomplishment>

Smoke test 0.6a1 Lightning and 0.6a1 Lightning WCAP with Thunderbird 3.0

<Add your accomplishment>

ctalbert is working on this

<Add your accomplishment>

damian has prepared know-how for our new calendars
feel free to add your own events!

<Add your accomplishment>

QA wanted bugs.

  • bug 339960 needs tester with WebDav share on OpenXChange server
  • Need a follow on FTP bug regarding the fact that separate channels are used for reading and writing
  • bug 340488 needs testing (upgrade test from Sunbird 0.2)

Create upgrade calendar seeds from the ICS files checked in with the dataloss bugs

Lets link ics files we encounter in bugzilla to Calendar:QA_ICSCollection

Need to continue testing the migration wizard!

Add the bugs you find here! :-)

Every week or two it is needed to have a look if any bug that was resolved as Fixed|W4M|Dup need to be supported by litmus - marked in whiteboard as [litmus testcase wanted]

List of bugs that were recently resolved.

damian

Need to test/verify if Thunderbird + Lightning can access calendars stored on ftp server.

From the comments in bug 347128 it appears that no error message is displayed at all. Needs more testing

Prepare ftp account to verify unconfirmed bugs that are related to ftp (low priority)

xFallenAngel

Issues that have been marked as enhancements have been reviewed and some of them that are more bug than enh has been updateed (changed severity) and vice versa, enh marked as bug have the lowest severity - since now we know how many unconfirmed bugs we have and how many of them are only enhancements.

damian

Litmus: unclear tests need to see how many of unclear test cases can be improved

damian


FYI: Calendar Checkins in the last 24 hours