Javascript:SpiderMonkey:ProjectGenerationGarbageCollection
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Wiki conversion of original Google Document: https://docs.google.com/a/jamsni.com/document/d/1-GZ8F0ZabvdpCnRQaecId0yuu4QFYr5pAvnRC_KFchc/edit
Objective
Implement Generational Garbage collection in Spider Monkey. <Some goal based off V8 performance delta % on Earley Boyer benchmark>
Accountable: Naveed
Responsible: Terrence, Steve, Jon, Nicholas, evilpie and Ms2ger
Consulted: bhackett billm
Informed: Product Marketing
Tracking Bug: [meta] Implement generational garbage collection - bug 619558
Milestones
Status | Milestone | Task | Deliverable | Assigned | Estimate | Due Date |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pending | 1 | Rooting analysis in the shell | green on mozilla-inbound | sfink, jonco, evilpie, Ms2ger | 2 weeks | 2013-03-07 |
in progress | 2 | Exactly rooted shell | green on mozilla-inbound | sfink, jonco, evilpie, Ms2ger | 2 weeks | 2013-03-14 |
not started | 3 | Rooting analysis in the browser | green on mozilla-inbound | sfink, jonco, evilpie, Ms2ger, terrence | 2 - 3 months | 2013-06-01 |
not started | 4 | Exactly rooted browser | green on mozilla-inbound | sfink, jonco, evilpie, Ms2ger, terrence | 2 - 4 month | 2013-07-01 |
in progress | 5 | GGC no-jit shell only build on TBPL | green on mozilla-inbound | terrence | 1 month | 2013-02-21 |
not started | 6 | JIT support | Ion+GGC displayed on AWFY | bhackett | 1 - 2 months | 2013-05-01 |
not started | 7 | Optimized GGC in shell | Ion+GGC faster than Ion-GGC on AWFY | bhackett | 2 - 3 months | 2013-06-01 |
not started | 8 | GGC in the browser | green on AWFY | terrence | 3 - 4 months | 2013-10-01 |
Steps
Exact Rooting done in JS Shell bug 753203
12 weeks started
- Rooting Analysis on TinderBox (sfink) - done
- Still need to unhide it for inbound - get it green, keep it green
- Get the root analysis build green - two weeks?
- Get jit-tests green bug 745742
- Get js ref tests green
- Get jsapi-tests green bug 831376
- Rooting analysis fuzz bugs bug 773746
- Rely on static analysis to make this not be a whack-a-mole game
- Remove E4X - done
- Do something about JSD
- Add exact roots to stack structures - 2 weeks
- AddRoot/RemoveRoot for Heap structures - 4 weeks
- Static code analysis bug 831409
- Fix all discovered rooting hazards (~800) (sfink,jonco) - 4 weeks
- Optimize all discovered over-rooting (~100)
- Automate static analysis bug 834912 (sfink)
JIT Integration with post barriers - 4 weeks, parallelized
- IonMonkey bug 831506 - 1 week (bhackett)
- JaegerMonkey bug 764876 - 2 days (bhackett)
- Baseline JIT bug 831507 - <ask jandem/djvj for an estimate>
Generational Garbage Collection in the Shell
- Implement prototype algorithm (terrence) - 1 week
- This is a potential milestone: we would need to build it and test it on TBPL similar to how |r| works now -- |GGCJS|.
- Re-implement HashTable rekeying
- We undid this code because it was a perf regression and was still a bit buggy. (terrence) - 3 weeks
- at least part of this is bug 726687
Exactly Root the Browser bug 831379 - 10 weeks
- This is a potential milestone: we would turn on exact rooting for release FF at this point. We would not get a performance boost from this (necessarily), but it would lock in our work to this point.
Performance Tuning - 4 weeks (This should probably start asap)
- Implement a Nursery bug 706885 - 1 week
- Test against V8 Earley-Boyer benchmark.
- Also v8 deltablue, raytrace
- We may need to Implement Bill’s Pools/Zones idea to get the nursery to the requisite perf bug 759585 - 6 weeks
- Refactor code to avoid rooting on hot paths and keep rooter overhead acceptable bug 831886 (bhackett) - done
Make the Post Barrier Verifier Green in the browser bug 764882
- Investigate how long it will take to do generational barriers - 1 week
- We may need to rewrite the maps in xpconnect and the browser in terms of HashTable: this could be a bunch of work.
- Make JS_IsAboutToBeFinalized indirect bug 765432 - 10 weeks
Other
- Should we establish a new benchmark specifically for GGC. (sfink votes yes)
- What would it measure? there are multiple goals, e.g. throughput/MMU/pause time
- Should we make it a public benchmark?
- What workloads should we consider?
- compartmental GC very important to us, not necessarily applicable to other implementations
- allocation rate (broken down into live vs garbage), steady behavior vs swapping between allocation + computation modes, etc.
- How can we keep our advantage on Splay benchmark
- possible to do with TI --- look at types of objects promoted from nursery to major heap, eventually start allocating them directly in the major heap
- Compacting GC - Revisit in Febuary/March - 1 Month
- Delayed until exact rooting is fully done. We can add this in if we have time in the schedule that we cannot parallelize.
Risks
- Team is responsible for many top crashers
- External rooting API has not been designed
- GGC algorithm has not been decided on - it may not be faster
- JSD1 exact rooting is lurking