Confirmed users, Administrators
5,526
edits
CA/BR Audit Guidance: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
→Audit Mistakes
m (→Audit Mistakes) |
|||
| Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
== Audit Mistakes == | == Audit Mistakes == | ||
During evaluation of a CA's root inclusion or change request, Mozilla uses public audit statements to help confirm that the CA is in compliance with the stated verification requirements, the BRs, and Mozilla's policy. Therefore, when members of Mozilla's community find a problem with certificates in the CA's hierarchy that should have been noted in the audit statement (as an exception or point of non-compliance), the CA may need to be re-audited to confirm that the problem has been resolved. | During evaluation of a CA's root inclusion or change request, Mozilla uses public audit statements to help confirm that the CA is in compliance with the stated verification requirements, the BRs, and Mozilla's policy. Therefore, when members of Mozilla's community find a problem with certificates in the CA's hierarchy that should have been noted in the audit statement (as an exception or point of non-compliance), the CA may need to be re-audited to confirm that the problem has been resolved. | ||