Confirmed users
1,090
edits
Dajbelshaw (talk | contribs) (Added fr comments) |
Dajbelshaw (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The community was asked the extent to which they supported the following proposal, using a five-point scale. 5 indicated strong agreement. | The community was asked the extent to which they supported the following proposal, using a five-point scale. 5 indicated strong agreement. | ||
'''I believe the Web Literacy Map should explicitly reference the Mozilla manifesto.''' | '''Proposal 1: I believe the Web Literacy Map should explicitly reference the Mozilla manifesto.''' | ||
* en_UK: 3.80 (138 respondents) | * en_UK: 3.80 (138 respondents) | ||
Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
"Debería hacer referencia a la filosofía de una web libre, basada en software libre. Las herramientas de webmaker deben ser libres para que la comunidad coopere con ellas." ''('Should refer to the philosophy of a free web-based free software. WebMaker tools should be free for the community to cooperate with them.')'' | "Debería hacer referencia a la filosofía de una web libre, basada en software libre. Las herramientas de webmaker deben ser libres para que la comunidad coopere con ellas." ''('Should refer to the philosophy of a free web-based free software. WebMaker tools should be free for the community to cooperate with them.')'' | ||
===Neutral=== | ===Neutral=== | ||
Line 103: | Line 104: | ||
"Branding assists, lends authority. But for me there is something missing in the Manifesto about the web as enabling the emergence of a more sustainable world, instead of contributing to the growing ecological crisis." | "Branding assists, lends authority. But for me there is something missing in the Manifesto about the web as enabling the emergence of a more sustainable world, instead of contributing to the growing ecological crisis." | ||
===Negative=== | ===Negative=== |