canmove, Confirmed users
2,041
edits
B2G/QA/Automation/UI/Strategy/Integration vs End to end: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
B2G/QA/Automation/UI/Strategy/Integration vs End to end (view source)
Revision as of 00:58, 13 February 2015
, 13 February 2015→Two different suites of UI automation
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
* Gaia Integration | * Gaia Integration | ||
** Must be quick-running with no non-deterministic factors | ** Must be quick-running with no non-deterministic factors | ||
** Results must be absolutely unambiguous | ** Results must be absolutely unambiguous | ||
** Coverage is restricted because of these rules | ** Coverage is restricted because of these rules | ||
** Will be run prior to each commit and can prevent a bad code change from landing | ** Will be run prior to each commit and can prevent a bad code change from landing | ||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
** Small isolated tests can be checked in with code changes immediately | ** Small isolated tests can be checked in with code changes immediately | ||
** Is sheriffed reliably and quickly through long-standing, established process | ** Is sheriffed reliably and quickly through long-standing, established process | ||
** Runs on B2G Desktop currently, will run on device as well soon | ** Runs on B2G Desktop currently, will run on device as well soon | ||
* Gaia Acceptance | * Gaia Acceptance | ||