Confirmed users
483
edits
Gaia/Architecture Proposal: Difference between revisions
→What about the security model?
Wilsonpage (talk | contribs) (Typo) |
|||
| Line 431: | Line 431: | ||
== What about the security model? == | == What about the security model? == | ||
This new architecture requires a new security model. However we are still unsure how this new model will look like. There are some ongoing work and discussions about this that you can follow on these links: | This new architecture requires a new security model. However we are still unsure how this new model will look like. There are some ongoing work and discussions about this that you can follow on these links: | ||
* [[Security/B2G/PermissionReview| | * [[Security/B2G/PermissionReview/Hostedrisks|Security Considerations & Recommendations for a hosted Gaia]] | ||
* [[Security/B2G/PermissionReview|Permissions review]] | |||
* [https://docs.google.com/a/mozilla.com/spreadsheets/d/1F-3jAfMPCIqTZzk-CeoK-WuHfFJp9QhEjh6cJ2nVyDE/edit#gid=0 Permissions analysis] | * [https://docs.google.com/a/mozilla.com/spreadsheets/d/1F-3jAfMPCIqTZzk-CeoK-WuHfFJp9QhEjh6cJ2nVyDE/edit#gid=0 Permissions analysis] | ||
* [https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mozilla.dev.webapi/PicfHG9Figk Proposal: TrustedCache as an alternative to signed packaged apps] | * [https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mozilla.dev.webapi/PicfHG9Figk Proposal: TrustedCache as an alternative to signed packaged apps] | ||