Talk:Security/Server Side TLS: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Added a question.)
 
Line 2: Line 2:


PSK has various use cases, such as with kiosks and other trusted clients. If said trusted clients are embedded systems, not having to do the public key exchange every time a connection is made saves significant CPU cycles. However, your article implies PSK weakens security -- else why include it in the disabled ciphers? --[[User:DisplayName|DisplayName]] ([[User talk:DisplayName|talk]]) 21:57, 20 May 2015 (PDT)
PSK has various use cases, such as with kiosks and other trusted clients. If said trusted clients are embedded systems, not having to do the public key exchange every time a connection is made saves significant CPU cycles. However, your article implies PSK weakens security -- else why include it in the disabled ciphers? --[[User:DisplayName|DisplayName]] ([[User talk:DisplayName|talk]]) 21:57, 20 May 2015 (PDT)
:Since No one has responded, I'm planning to remove !PSK from the recommendations. --[[User:DisplayName|DisplayName]] ([[User talk:DisplayName|talk]]) 18:24, 2 June 2015 (PDT)


== Proposed changes to ciphersuites ==
== Proposed changes to ciphersuites ==

Navigation menu