2
edits
DisplayName (talk | contribs) (Added a question.) |
DisplayName (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
PSK has various use cases, such as with kiosks and other trusted clients. If said trusted clients are embedded systems, not having to do the public key exchange every time a connection is made saves significant CPU cycles. However, your article implies PSK weakens security -- else why include it in the disabled ciphers? --[[User:DisplayName|DisplayName]] ([[User talk:DisplayName|talk]]) 21:57, 20 May 2015 (PDT) | PSK has various use cases, such as with kiosks and other trusted clients. If said trusted clients are embedded systems, not having to do the public key exchange every time a connection is made saves significant CPU cycles. However, your article implies PSK weakens security -- else why include it in the disabled ciphers? --[[User:DisplayName|DisplayName]] ([[User talk:DisplayName|talk]]) 21:57, 20 May 2015 (PDT) | ||
:Since No one has responded, I'm planning to remove !PSK from the recommendations. --[[User:DisplayName|DisplayName]] ([[User talk:DisplayName|talk]]) 18:24, 2 June 2015 (PDT) | |||
== Proposed changes to ciphersuites == | == Proposed changes to ciphersuites == |
edits